From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 4/9] target-i386: Replace cpuid_*features fields with a feature word array
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 01:03:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51819F25.2090800@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366657220-776-5-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Am 22.04.2013 21:00, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> This replaces the feature-bit fields on both X86CPU and x86_def_t
> structs with an array.
>
> With this, we will be able to simplify code that simply does the same
> operation on all feature words (e.g. kvm_check_features_against_host(),
> filter_features_for_kvm(), add_flagname_to_bitmaps(), CPU feature-bit
> property lookup/registration, and the proposed "feature-words" property)
>
> The following field replacements were made on X86CPU and x86_def_t:
>
> (cpuid_)features -> features[FEAT_1_EDX]
> (cpuid_)ext_features -> features[FEAT_1_ECX]
> (cpuid_)ext2_features -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX]
> (cpuid_)ext3_features -> features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX]
> (cpuid_)ext4_features -> features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX]
> (cpuid_)kvm_features -> features[FEAT_KVM]
> (cpuid_)svm_features -> features[FEAT_SVM]
> (cpuid_)7_0_ebx_features -> features[FEAT_7_0_EBX]
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-By: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
[...]
> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
> index 73ae2ef..110ef98 100644
> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
[...]
> @@ -1490,22 +1485,22 @@ static void cpu_x86_parse_featurestr(X86CPU *cpu, char *features, Error **errp)
> }
> featurestr = strtok(NULL, ",");
> }
> - env->cpuid_features |= plus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext_features |= plus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features |= plus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features |= plus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> - env->cpuid_svm_features |= plus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features |= plus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> - env->cpuid_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> - env->cpuid_svm_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features &= ~minus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] |= plus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] |= plus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] |= plus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] |= plus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] |= plus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] |= plus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] &= ~minus_features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
>
> out:
> return;
Can this be done in a loop as a follow-up?
[...]
> @@ -1630,24 +1625,24 @@ static void cpu_x86_register(X86CPU *cpu, const char *name, Error **errp)
> }
>
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> - def->kvm_features |= kvm_default_features;
> + def->features[FEAT_KVM] |= kvm_default_features;
> }
> - def->ext_features |= CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR;
> + def->features[FEAT_1_ECX] |= CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR;
>
> object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu), def->vendor, "vendor", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->level, "level", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->family, "family", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->model, "model", errp);
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->stepping, "stepping", errp);
> - env->cpuid_features = def->features;
> - env->cpuid_ext_features = def->ext_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext2_features = def->ext2_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext3_features = def->ext3_features;
> + env->features[FEAT_1_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_1_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_1_ECX] = def->features[FEAT_1_ECX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_8000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX] = def->features[FEAT_8000_0001_ECX];
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(cpu), def->xlevel, "xlevel", errp);
> - env->cpuid_kvm_features = def->kvm_features;
> - env->cpuid_svm_features = def->svm_features;
> - env->cpuid_ext4_features = def->ext4_features;
> - env->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features = def->cpuid_7_0_ebx_features;
> + env->features[FEAT_KVM] = def->features[FEAT_KVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_SVM] = def->features[FEAT_SVM];
> + env->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX] = def->features[FEAT_C000_0001_EDX];
> + env->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX] = def->features[FEAT_7_0_EBX];
> env->cpuid_xlevel2 = def->xlevel2;
>
> object_property_set_str(OBJECT(cpu), def->model_id, "model-id", errp);
[snip]
Dito?
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-22 19:00 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 0/9] x86: feature words array (v11) + "feature-words" property Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 1/9] target-i386: cleanup: Group together level, xlevel, xlevel2 fields Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 2/9] target-i386/kvm.c: Code formatting changes Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-01 22:55 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 3/9] target-i386/cpu.c: Break lines so they don't get too long Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 4/9] target-i386: Replace cpuid_*features fields with a feature word array Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-01 23:03 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-05-02 15:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 5/9] target-i386: Add ECX information to FeatureWordInfo Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:16 ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-03 15:54 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-06 16:27 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 6/9] target-i386: Add "feature-words" property Eduardo Habkost
2013-04-22 20:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] " Eric Blake
2013-04-23 19:25 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 11:34 ` [Qemu-devel] " Igor Mammedov
2013-05-03 13:17 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 14:25 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-03 14:57 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 7/9] target-i386: Use FeatureWord loop on filter_features_for_kvm() Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:01 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-06 16:28 ` Andreas Färber
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 8/9] target-i386: Introduce X86CPU.filtered_features field Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:03 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 19:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 9/9] target-i386: Add "filtered-features" property to X86CPU Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-03 15:10 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-01 22:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu 0/9] x86: feature words array (v11) + "feature-words" property Andreas Färber
2013-05-02 19:43 ` Eduardo Habkost
2013-05-02 19:48 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-03 14:58 ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-03 15:23 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-05-03 15:31 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51819F25.2090800@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).