From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXuqC-0006ja-LW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:50:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXuqB-0005z2-Bh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:50:36 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:50099 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXuqB-0005yt-5F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 10:50:35 -0400 Message-ID: <51827D36.3080406@suse.de> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 16:50:30 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130426171029.3e159116@thinkpad> <20130426153108.GX2900@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <517A9E3E.2060901@suse.de> <20130426173915.20d02c7d@thinkpad> <20130426173040.GK11821@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20130426194110.43ff3a80@thinkpad> <20130426190115.GA2900@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <20130430190423.3b0be80d@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <20130430195749.GI28606@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> <5180F928.2040406@suse.de> <20130502144321.GL28606@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> In-Reply-To: <20130502144321.GL28606@otherpad.lan.raisama.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 7/7] target-i386: Disable direct passthrough of PMU CPUID leaf by default List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gleb Natapov Am 02.05.2013 16:43, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:14:48PM +0200, Andreas F=E4rber wrote: >> Am 30.04.2013 21:57, schrieb Eduardo Habkost: >>> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 07:04:23PM +0200, Igor Mammedov wrote: >>>> It's impossible to implement "n270 movbe" fixup with compat props c= urrently, >>>> so 5/7 + 1/7 looks ok. We can drop them once features converted to s= tatic properties >>>> + sub-classes. >>> >>> True. But why this doesn't apply to 6/7 (486 model=3D8) as well? >> >> Eduardo, this series is "RFC". Are you going to grant permission to pi= ck >> individual agreed-on patches from it or are you planning to resend? >=20 > I was planning to rebase and resend because of the other changes > entering qom-cpu and to address the concerns about the other patches. > But if you want to pick patches directly from this RFC series, I don't > mind at all. It's up to you. OK. Could you look at the series I posted yesterday? If you're okay with it and Anthony doesn't get a heart attack due to my qdev creativity ;) I'd like to rebase the remainder of this series on it. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg