From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54622)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UXvSn-0005o0-0i
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:30:30 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UXvSl-0002Oo-FL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:30:28 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::233]:32816)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UXvSl-0002OU-9w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 May 2013 11:30:27 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f179.google.com with SMTP id t9so582820wey.24
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 02 May 2013 08:30:26 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5182868D.3090200@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 17:30:21 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20130502135143.GA1171@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130502135143.GA1171@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] posting patches in pull requests (was Re: [PATCH
 08/29] cpu: Add qemu_for_each_cpu())
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Il 02/05/2013 15:51, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> Anthony, can we please make it a rule that
> all patches in pull request are tagged specially?
> 
> As it is, patchwork is full of patches that were already reviewed and
> merged, all my scripts that were filtering and sorting patches are also
> useless, and I get to wade through each patch for the second time.
> 
> Maybe you could teach your scripts to ignore [PULL X/Y] where X>0?
> 
> This way people could tag all resent patches
> as PULL.
> 
> Further,
> PULL 0/2
> PULL 1/2
> PULL 2/2
> 
> aligns better than
> 
> PULL 0/2
> PATCH 1/2
> PATCH 2/2

Sure, I was just following others for example.

/me changes his scripts...

-s/PATCH/PULL/ if (/PATCH 0+\\//);
+s/PATCH/PULL/ if (/^Subject:/);

Yes, Perl...

Paolo