qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: "\"李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li>\"" <yzt356@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] CPU vendor in KVM
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 10:47:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5184CB0D.4010004@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABpY8M+ZjO4xKWdV-6F5QJok1qJTd+iW6Q1LPi_3tNUa0=X4Rg@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1889 bytes --]

Please don't top-post.

On 2013-05-04 10:45, 李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li> wrote:
> But will the difference between the vendor ID and family number cause
> confusion to the OS in VM?

The confusion is not yet clear to me. About which "-cpu ..." were you
talking?

Jan

> 
> On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> wrote:
>> On 2013-05-04 09:50, 李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li> wrote:
>>> Hi Jan and All,
>>> I find that when enable KVM with qemu, vendor ID of simulated CPU will be
>>> set the same as host, but other features such as level, family, model,
>>> stepping are not changed. This may bring out a confusing result, the
>>> simulated CPU has a vendor name of "GenuineIntel" but with family number
>>> "16".
>>>
>>> I disabled the related code in function cpu_x86_find_by_name:
>>> diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.c b/target-i386/cpu.c
>>> index e2302d8..df0e82e 100644
>>> --- a/target-i386/cpu.c
>>> +++ b/target-i386/cpu.c
>>> @@ -1295,7 +1295,8 @@ static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t
>>> *x86_cpu_def, const char *name)
>>>               * KVM's sysenter/syscall emulation in compatibility mode and
>>>               * when doing cross vendor migration
>>>               */
>>> -            if (kvm_enabled()) {
>>> +            //if (kvm_enabled()) {
>>> +            if (0) {
>>>                  uint32_t  ebx = 0, ecx = 0, edx = 0;
>>>                  host_cpuid(0, 0, NULL, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
>>>                  x86_cpu_vendor_words2str(x86_cpu_def->vendor, ebx, edx,
>>> ecx);
>>>
>>> And the information of CPU remains consistent and the VM runs OK, even
>>> though with nested environment.
>>>
>>> Why should qemu set simulated cpu's vendor same as the host in KVM
>>> environment?
>>
>> The reason (and a way out) is given in the comment above the cited code.
>>
>> Jan
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-04  8:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-04  7:50 [Qemu-devel] CPU vendor in KVM 李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li>
2013-05-04  8:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-04  8:45   ` 李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li>
2013-05-04  8:47     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-05-04  8:52       ` 李春奇 <Arthur Chunqi Li>
2013-05-04  9:01         ` Jan Kiszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5184CB0D.4010004@web.de \
    --to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=yzt356@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).