From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Liu Ping Fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] push mmio dispatch out of big lock
Date: Sat, 04 May 2013 12:42:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5184E601.9030407@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5184D942.5020506@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1493 bytes --]
On 2013-05-04 11:47, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/05/2013 10:04, Jan Kiszka ha scritto:
>> We can't change the semantics of opaque as long as old_mmio / old_portio
>> are around. But we need a flag anyway to indicate if a region is
>> depending on BQL or not. Adding a separate "Object *owner" to
>> MemoryRegion can serve both purposes. Then we define something like
>>
>> void memory_region_set_local_locking(MemoryRegion *mr,
>> bool local_locking,
>> Object *owner);
>>
>> to control the property (if local_locking is true, owner must be
>> non-NULL, of course). That's quite similar to my old prototype here that
>> had memory_region_set/clear_global_locking.
>
> I think setting the owner can be done separately from enabling local
> lock. For example, memory_region_find could also have a variant that
> adds a ref to the owner. It would be very similar to what Ping Fan is
> doing in the virtio-dataplane's HostMem data structure.
That's trivial to break up, but I'm not sure if there will be reasonable
scenarios where a region requires reference counting without being able
to work without the BQL. RAM, e.g., should always work BQL-free (once we
have the infrastructure in place).
And memory_region_find should likely always increment a reference if the
target region has an owner. We should convert its users to properly
dereference the region once done with it.
Jan
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 263 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-04 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-25 2:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] push mmio dispatch out of big lock Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-25 2:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/7] qom: apply atomic on object's refcount Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-28 17:16 ` Richard Henderson
2012-11-29 8:35 ` liu ping fan
2012-11-25 2:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/7] hotplug: introduce qdev_unplug_complete() to remove device from views Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-25 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/7] pci: remove pci device from mem view when unplug Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-25 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/7] memory: introduce local lock for address space Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-25 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/7] memory: make mmio dispatch able to be out of biglock Liu Ping Fan
2013-05-06 11:21 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 11:25 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 11:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-11-25 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/7] memory: introduce tls context to trace nested mmio request issue Liu Ping Fan
2012-11-25 2:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 7/7] vcpu: push mmio dispatcher out of big lock Liu Ping Fan
2012-12-06 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/7] push mmio dispatch " liu ping fan
2013-05-02 16:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-02 17:14 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-03 7:37 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-03 8:04 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-04 9:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-04 10:42 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2013-05-06 8:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 8:40 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 10:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 10:56 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 10:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 11:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 11:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 11:39 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 11:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 12:06 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 13:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 14:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-05-06 14:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-06 1:46 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-06 1:57 ` liu ping fan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5184E601.9030407@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).