From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSEI-0006fN-94 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:41:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSEC-0004WR-UC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:41:50 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::231]:35799) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZSEC-0004WA-Nt for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 16:41:44 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f177.google.com with SMTP id o10so1894947eaj.8 for ; Mon, 06 May 2013 13:41:44 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5188157F.1080302@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 06 May 2013 22:41:35 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wqrci2zs.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <87r4hj4zqg.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87r4hj4zqg.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Last Call for 1.5 before Hard Freeze List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Jordan Justen , qemu-devel , Gleb Natapov Il 06/05/2013 22:31, Anthony Liguori ha scritto: > Jordan Justen writes: > >> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> I believe I have processed all of the outstanding pull requests and >>> patches tagged for 1.5. If there are any other patches or pull requests >>> you would like to be considered, please respond to this note with a >>> pointer to the patch or make sure you send it out tagged with 'for-1.5' >>> no later than 5pm US/Eastern. >> >> Is there a chance of including the KVM PC flash series in 1.5? >> Unfortunately, I'm assuming no given the timing. > > I think we're going to need to delay it. Did we ever come to a > consensus about what to do on older kernels? Yes, the patches only use the new feature is -pflash is given on the command line. memory_region_set_readonly is only used in a few places, so I think this series could go in; it is a fix for a TCG-mode regression. I'm curious however if it causes -M isapc to regress, because in 1.4 it works only in KVM mode, not in TCG mode. Paolo