From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, dietmar@proxmox.com, imain@redhat.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command
Date: Sat, 11 May 2013 10:02:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <518DFB26.6090702@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518DBC5E.1020700@redhat.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Il 11/05/2013 05:34, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> On 05/08/2013 06:49 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 29.04.2013 um 09:42 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>>> @block-backup
>>>
>
>> drive-backup would probably be a more consistent naming. We would
>> then still have block-backup for a future low-level command that
>> doesn't create everything by itself but takes an existing
>> BlockDriverState (e.g. created by blockdev-add).
>
> At least it would match why we named a command 'drive-mirror'
> instead of 'block-mirror'.
>
> Hmm, looking at qapi-schema.json, I wonder if we can rename
> 'BlockdevAction' to 'TransactionAction' as used in the
> @transaction command. It wouldn't change what is sent over the
> wire in JSON, and until we have full introspection, there is no
> visibility into the type name used. Changing the name now would
> let it be more generic to adding future transaction items that are
> not blockdev related.
Right. For example, "cont" could be made transactionable too (and
executed only if the transaction succeeds).
Paolo
>>
>> We should also make it transactionable from the beginning, as we
>> don't have schema introspection yet. This way we allow to assume
>> that if the standalone command exists, the transaction subcommand
>> exists as well.
>
> Agreed - existence of a command at the same time the command is
> made transactionable serves as a nice substitute for not having
> full introspection into the 'BlockdevAction' union type, whereas if
> we introduce the command now but not transaction support until 1.7,
> life becomes tougher to know when it can be used where (although I
> HOPE we have introspection in 1.6).
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=ULCr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-11 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 7:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: block-backup live backup command Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add basic backup support to block driver Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-08 12:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-08 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-14 8:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-14 13:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-14 13:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-14 15:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-30 3:37 ` Fam Zheng
2013-05-30 12:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-08 12:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-11 3:34 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-11 8:02 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-05-13 8:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-14 8:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-11 4:02 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-13 8:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 12:56 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-13 13:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 13:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-13 14:14 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-13 14:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 14:50 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-14 2:18 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-14 8:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] qemu-iotests: add 054 block-backup test case Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=518DFB26.6090702@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=imain@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).