From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
imain@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 08:14:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5190F534.40806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130513091858.54c4e4e6@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1919 bytes --]
On 05/13/2013 07:18 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>> Luiz, any idea how to do something like this, a QAPI enum with values
>>>> that are determined at runtime? Especially with respect to the coming
>>>> schema introspection?
>>>
>>> Or maybe we make the 'enum' list ALL possible types, but then add a
>>> query-* command that returns an array of only those enum values that are
>>> supported. Introspection would see all types, but the query command
>>> would be the useful variant that is runtime-dependent.
>
> Agreed. This is a capability, and we're adding query- commands to query
> capabilities.
>
>> Then is there any advantage in making it an enum in the first place?
>
> Eric is in a better position to answer this, but the fact that this can
> be queried isn't a strong pro for having it?
Hmm, you raise an interesting point - if we have a query-block-formats
command that returns an array of strings, then keep 'str' everywhere
else a format is required, that is no different for what is sent over
the wire compared to a query-block-formats that returns an array of
'BlockFormat' enum values, with the enum showing all possible formats
(even if support wasn't compiled in), and with 'BlockFormat' everywhere
else. Introspection-wise, you'd have to know that you call
query-block-formats instead of introspecting on the type of the format
argument, but information-wise, there's no loss of details if the query-
command provides the runtime list, and the remaining commands stick with
'str'. I still think an enum is a bit nicer from the type-safety
aspect, but I'm finding it hard to envision any scenario where libvirt
would have to resort to introspection if we have a query-block-formats
in place, and thus am not opposed to your idea of avoiding the enum.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-13 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-29 7:42 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] block: block-backup live backup command Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] block: add basic backup support to block driver Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-08 12:39 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-08 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-14 8:51 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-14 13:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-14 13:43 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-14 15:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-30 3:37 ` Fam Zheng
2013-05-30 12:27 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] block: add block-backup QMP command Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-08 12:49 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-11 3:34 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-11 8:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-13 8:23 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-14 8:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-11 4:02 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-13 8:28 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 12:56 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-13 13:09 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 13:18 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-13 14:14 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-05-13 14:27 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-13 14:50 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-14 2:18 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-14 8:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-29 7:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] qemu-iotests: add 054 block-backup test case Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5190F534.40806@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=imain@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).