From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45436) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdFzl-0007ER-Im for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 04:26:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UdFze-0002ZJ-Eo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 17 May 2013 04:26:33 -0400 Message-ID: <5195E9AD.7040509@suse.de> Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:26:21 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1368597869-30405-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-moxie: replace target_phys_addr_t with hwaddr List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Green Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Hu Tao Anthony G., Am 15.05.2013 10:23, schrieb Peter Maydell: > On 15 May 2013 07:04, Hu Tao wrote: >> target_phys_addr_t has been already replaced by hwaddr, but this >> one is introduced after. >> >> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao >=20 > Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell >=20 > This doesn't cause compile errors because it's in a bit > of code that can never get compiled (it's inside a > CONFIG_USER_ONLY block but there is no moxie-linux-user > target in configure). A similar issue had come up before and I don't remember seeing a clear answer: Are you planning to actually implement moxie-linux-user and enable it by default, so that we can catch any errors? Or should we rather drop any such unused CONFIG_USER_ONLY code from target-moxie? Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg