From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: set MALLOC_PERTURB_ to expose memory bugs
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 09:50:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519627AC.6010305@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QWbCXBzi8NnX2bruQtoB8JApUHRxk-_CUggogfqsDjuuw@mail.gmail.com>
On 17/05/13 08:15 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>>> glibc wipes malloc(3) memory when the MALLOC_PERTURB_ environment
>>> variable is set. The value of the environment variable determines the
>>> bit pattern used to wipe memory. For more information, see
>>> http://udrepper.livejournal.com/11429.html.
>>>
>>> Set MALLOC_PERTURB_ for gtester and qemu-iotests. Note we always set
>>> the environment variable to 1 so the test is deterministic. Setting a
>>> random variable might expose more bugs but would be harder to reproduce.
>>>
>>> Both make check and qemu-iotests pass with MALLOC_PERTURB_ enabled.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Lucas noticed KVM autotest failures when enabling MALLOC_PERTURB_. By enabling
>>> it for in-tree test suites we can detect memory management errors earlier.
>>>
>>> tests/Makefile | 4 +++-
>>> tests/qemu-iotests/check | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/Makefile b/tests/Makefile
>>> index a307d5a..25f6d28 100644
>>> --- a/tests/Makefile
>>> +++ b/tests/Makefile
>>> @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ GCOV_OPTIONS = -n $(if $(V),-f,)
>>> $(patsubst %, check-qtest-%, $(QTEST_TARGETS)): check-qtest-%: $(check-qtest-y)
>>> $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@rm -f *.gcda */*.gcda */*/*.gcda */*/*/*.gcda,)
>>> $(call quiet-command,QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$*-softmmu/qemu-system-$* \
>>> + MALLOC_PERTURB_=1 \
>>> gtester $(GTESTER_OPTIONS) -m=$(SPEED) $(check-qtest-$*-y),"GTESTER $@")
>>> $(if $(CONFIG_GCOV),@for f in $(gcov-files-$*-y); do \
>>> echo Gcov report for $$f:;\
>>
>> If you want punishment, why not go for extra punishment?
>>
>> MALLOC_PERTURB_=$(($RANDOM % 255 + 1))
>
> Covered in the commit description:
> "Note we always set
> the environment variable to 1 so the test is deterministic. Setting a
> random variable might expose more bugs but would be harder to reproduce."
>
> I didn't want to clutter output with "MALLOC_PERTURB_=123" on every
> run. AFAIK we have no log where this can be silently stashed. I
> guess we could write it to a file and add that to .gitignore.
Yes, you could consider to have a debug log or something similar.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-17 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-17 8:52 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: set MALLOC_PERTURB_ to expose memory bugs Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-17 9:54 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-05-17 10:07 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2013-05-17 10:58 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-05-17 12:52 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2013-05-17 11:16 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-17 12:49 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues
2013-05-19 16:51 ` Richard W.M. Jones
2013-05-17 11:15 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-17 12:50 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519627AC.6010305@redhat.com \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).