From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeOKQ-0005lD-BT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:33:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeOJx-0003vt-8y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:34 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:47058) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeOJx-0003vf-2S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:32:05 -0400 Received: by mail-gh0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r17so1479528ghr.19 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 04:32:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <519A09AE.5080205@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 13:31:58 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <519A0268.7050308@redhat.com> <519A08F2.1020007@weilnetz.de> In-Reply-To: <519A08F2.1020007@weilnetz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] pending 1.5 patches List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Weil Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel Il 20/05/2013 13:28, Stefan Weil ha scritto: > Am 20.05.2013 13:00, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> I see the following patches on the list that IMO deserve inclusion into >> 1.5. All of them should be low-risk. >> >> <1368718348-15199-1-git-send-email-emaste@freebsd.org> >> [PATCH v2] Rename hexdump to avoid FreeBSD libutil conflict >> >> <1369046780-17498-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> >> [PATCH for-1.5 resend] vl: new runstate transition: >> RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED -> RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE >> >> <1369045989-14016-1-git-send-email-hpoussin@reactos.org> >> [PATCH for-1.5] osdep: fix qemu_anon_ram_free trace (+ fix compilation >> on 32 bit hosts) > > See also http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244757/ Yes, they are identical. >> <1369032665-18159-2-git-send-email-lilei@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> [PATCH 1/3] chardev: Make consistent with udp device for new qapi backend >> (not the rest of the series) >> >> There is also <20130520081814.GA8162@redhat.com>, but I think it's >> too intrusive. > > Plus this one, please: > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244758/ > spitz: Fix compiler warning (MinGW-w64) Agreed. Paolo