From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Could configure generate QEMU's linker scripts?
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 11:14:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519BB993.7070703@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPyFy2BETwnU-_cxEXTJSBk-yvqnE7SZGXJp5r+MCyiPv4+V_A@mail.gmail.com>
On 05/21/2013 10:51 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 20 May 2013 13:21, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
>> In general I believe that using the -Ttext-segment ADDR flag for ld
>> would completely obviate the need for even editing the link script.
>
> That sounds cleaner, although there's a wrinkle for FreeBSD. We're
> still using binutils version 2.17.50 in the base system, since it is
> the last one licensed under GPLv2, and it doesn't support the
> -Ttext-segment flag. There is -Ttext but it still leaves some parts
> behind at the default load address. I assume that the reason for
> changing the QEMU load address is to leave the default free for the
> guest application to use, making -Ttext unsuitable.
>
> If we can't use an approach along the lines of my earlier sed script
> we'll just have to find a way to support -Ttext-segment in FreeBSD,
> either by having the original patch that introduced it made available
> under GPLv2, reimplementing the functionality, or by requiring use of
> a later binutils (from the FreeBSD ports tree).
Certainly using a decent binutils would be easiest.
Although for the purposes of getting the qemu application out of the virtual
address space that the *-bsd-user guest will want to use, it might be better to
use -fPIE. At least on linux that tends to put the x86_64 host binary up in
(very) high memory.
The best long term solution is to be able to enable softmmu for *-user guests.
It's the only way to make certain 64-on-32 combinations work, and the only way
to fix a myriad of problems that occur when the host and guest page sizes don't
match. At which point it doesn't matter where the host binary resides.
> One oddity I noticed is that alpha and s390x seem to not use the ld
> script (with the comment "The default placement of the application is
> fine" in configure), so I'm not sure why QEMU includes those files.
I thought I deleted those when I changed the configure script...
r~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-21 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-19 16:30 [Qemu-devel] Could configure generate QEMU's linker scripts? Ed Maste
2013-05-19 19:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-20 0:22 ` Aurelien Jarno
2013-05-20 17:21 ` Richard Henderson
2013-05-21 17:51 ` Ed Maste
2013-05-21 18:14 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2013-06-02 17:15 ` Peter Maydell
2013-06-03 14:23 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-03 14:57 ` Peter Maydell
2013-06-03 15:01 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-04 15:55 ` Claudio Fontana
2013-06-04 16:13 ` Peter Maydell
2013-06-04 16:18 ` Richard Henderson
2013-06-05 9:03 ` Claudio Fontana
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519BB993.7070703@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=emaste@freebsd.org \
--cc=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).