From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: oliver.francke@filoo.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
qemu-stable <qemu-stable@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: flush queued packets when RxBufPtr is written
Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 14:53:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <519CBFCA.4060803@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369227018-27837-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
Am 22.05.2013 14:50, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> Net queues support efficient "receive disable". For example, tap's file
> descriptor will not be polled while its peer has receive disabled. This
> saves CPU cycles for needlessly copying and then dropping packets which
> the peer cannot receive.
>
> rtl8139 is missing the qemu_flush_queued_packets() call that wakes the
> queue up when receive becomes possible again.
>
> As a result, the Windows 7 guest driver reaches a state where the
> rtl8139 cannot receive packets. The driver has actually refilled the
> receive buffer but we never resume reception.
>
> The bug can be reproduced by running a large FTP 'get' inside a Windows
> 7 guest:
>
> $ qemu -netdev tap,id=tap0,...
> -device rtl8139,netdev=tap0
>
> The Linux guest driver does not trigger the bug, probably due to a
> different buffer management strategy.
>
> Reported-by: Oliver Francke <oliver.francke@filoo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Sounds as if we should
Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Andreas
> ---
> hw/net/rtl8139.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/net/rtl8139.c b/hw/net/rtl8139.c
> index 9369507..7993f9f 100644
> --- a/hw/net/rtl8139.c
> +++ b/hw/net/rtl8139.c
> @@ -2575,6 +2575,9 @@ static void rtl8139_RxBufPtr_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
> /* this value is off by 16 */
> s->RxBufPtr = MOD2(val + 0x10, s->RxBufferSize);
>
> + /* more buffer space may be available so try to receive */
> + qemu_flush_queued_packets(qemu_get_queue(s->nic));
> +
> DPRINTF(" CAPR write: rx buffer length %d head 0x%04x read 0x%04x\n",
> s->RxBufferSize, s->RxBufAddr, s->RxBufPtr);
> }
>
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-22 12:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-22 12:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: flush queued packets when RxBufPtr is written Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-22 12:53 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
2013-05-22 13:33 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-24 14:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-27 6:15 ` Peter Lieven
2013-05-27 8:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-27 10:19 ` Peter Lieven
2013-05-27 14:07 ` Oliver Francke
2013-05-27 14:24 ` Peter Lieven
2013-05-27 15:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-28 6:27 ` Peter Lieven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=519CBFCA.4060803@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=oliver.francke@filoo.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).