From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfZ7l-0005T1-TV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:16:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfZ7e-0003en-Ft for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:16:21 -0400 Received: from mail-ea0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4013:c01::22b]:50295) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UfZ0B-0000a9-0G for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 23 May 2013 13:08:31 -0400 Received: by mail-ea0-f171.google.com with SMTP id b15so1998021eae.30 for ; Thu, 23 May 2013 10:08:30 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <519E4D03.201@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 19:08:19 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1369133851-1894-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519C2DC1.5010600@ozlabs.ru> <519C8EBD.7080107@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <519C8EBD.7080107@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/30] Introduction of IOMMUs into the memory API List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy , peter.maydell@linaro.org, jan.kiszka@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, David Gibson Il 22/05/2013 11:24, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: > Il 22/05/2013 04:30, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto: >> On 05/21/2013 08:57 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> This is part 1 of the memory API updates for 1.6. (Part 2 is the >>> introduction of get/set_owner, part 3 is the introduction of the >>> RCU-style flatview). >>> >>> Compared to the first submissions, there are a few extra cleanup >>> patches, and address_space_rw/read/write grew a return value so >>> that the existing DMAContext API doesn't need to change. >>> >> >> Is this series much different from the one in >> https://github.com/bonzini/qemu/tree/iommu (hope it is the same :) )? > > Not much, I've updated the branch now. BTW, if you give me your Tested-by it would be good, since most comments have been cosmetic. I'd like to collect all of Peter's Reviewed-by from the RFC and send a pull request next week. Then we can proceed with the fun stuff. :) Paolo