qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Mark Trumpold <markt@netqa.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, markt@tachyon.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] 'qemu-nbd' explicit flush
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 14:10:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <519F58B2.50302@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <W4504910164140841369346311@atl4webmail30>

Il 23/05/2013 23:58, Mark Trumpold ha scritto:
> I have a working configuration using the signal approach suggested by Stefan.
> 
> 'qemu-nbd.c' is patched as follows:
> 
>     do {
>         main_loop_wait(false);
> +       if (sighup_reported) {
> +           sighup_reported = false;
> +           bdrv_drain_all();
> +           bdrv_flush_all();
>         }
>     } while (!sigterm_reported && (persistent || !nbd_started || nb_fds > 0));
> 
> The driving script was patched as follows:

Yes, a patch along these lines would be acceptable.

>      mount -o remount,ro /dev/nbd0
>      blockdev --flushbufs /dev/nbd0
> +    kill -HUP <qemu-nbd process id>
> 
> I needed to retain 'blockdev --flushbufs' for things to work. Seems
> the 'bdrv_flush_all' is flushing what is being missed by the blockdev
> flush. I did not go back an retest with 'fsync' or other approaches I
> had tried before.

Right.  That said, I think a newer kernel would do what you want.
Perhaps you can look at the actual patches that went into 3.9 and
backport them.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-05-24 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-23 21:58 [Qemu-devel] 'qemu-nbd' explicit flush Mark Trumpold
2013-05-24  9:05 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-25 17:42   ` Mark Trumpold
2013-05-27 12:36     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-24 12:10 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-05-28 18:00 Mark Trumpold
2013-05-29  7:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-29 15:29   ` Mark Trumpold
2013-06-07 14:00   ` Mark Trumpold
2013-05-23 23:35 Mark Trumpold
2013-05-24  9:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-22 16:10 Mark Trumpold
2013-05-21 20:01 Mark Trumpold
2013-05-22  9:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-22 11:07   ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=519F58B2.50302@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=markt@netqa.com \
    --cc=markt@tachyon.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).