From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33310) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufs7w-0001CF-AD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 09:33:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufs7r-0000Nk-Ek for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 09:33:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:3618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufs7r-0000Ne-5S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 09:33:43 -0400 Message-ID: <519F6C28.9050302@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:33:28 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1369133851-1894-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1369133851-1894-16-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <519F1E7E.7050700@redhat.com> <519F63EE.8080208@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/30] memory: add address_space_valid List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: David Gibson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, jan.kiszka@gmail.com Il 24/05/2013 15:27, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > On 24 May 2013 13:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> If it's okay >> for you, I'll send a pull request up to "memory: clean up phys_page_find" >> and go on with the next series. > > That's fine with me, but please don't forget to fix up > the doc comment for memory_region_find() (see comments on > patch 6/30). You can do that in a patch in the next series, > though, I guess. What about this: /** * memory_region_find: translate an address/size relative to a * MemoryRegion into a #MemoryRegionSection. * * Locates the first #MemoryRegion within @mr that overlaps the range * given by @addr and @size. * * Returns a #MemoryRegionSection that describes a contiguous overlap. * It will have the following characteristics: * .@size = 0 iff no overlap was found * .@mr is non-%NULL iff an overlap was found * * Remember that in the return value the @offset_within_region is * relative to the returned region (in the .@mr field), not to the * @mr argument. * * Similarly, the .@offset_within_address_space is relative to the * address space that contains both regions, the passed and the * returned one. However, in the special case where the @mr argument * has no parent (and thus is the root of the address space), the * following will hold: * .@offset_within_address_space >= @addr * .@offset_within_address_space + .@size <= @addr + @size * * @mr: a MemoryRegion within which @addr is a relative address * @addr: start of the area within @as to be searched * @size: size of the area to be searched */ ? Paolo