From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufwfq-0006Xi-5c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:25:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufwfm-0005tC-8Q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:25:06 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16285) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ufwfl-0005qQ-WC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 24 May 2013 14:25:02 -0400 Message-ID: <519FB105.5030206@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 20:27:17 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130521153333.4880.74390.stgit@hds.com> <20130521153345.4880.68009.stgit@hds.com> <519F6D5E.8010707@redhat.com> <519F8E6A.9050206@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <519F8E6A.9050206@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 03/11] Add a script to extract VSS SDK headers on POSIX system List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, vrozenfe@redhat.com, Tomoki Sekiyama , pbonzini@redhat.com, seiji.aguchi@hds.com, areis@redhat.com On 05/24/13 17:59, Eric Blake wrote: > On 05/24/2013 07:38 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > >>> +++ b/scripts/extract-vsssdk-headers >>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ >>> +#! /bin/bash >>> + > >>> +MAGIC=$'\xd0\xcf\x11\xe0\xa1\xb1\x1a\xe1' >> >> Can't help mentioning the following portable (alas, octal) equivalent :) >> >> MAGIC=$(printf '%b' '\0320\0317\0021\0340\0241\0261\0032\0341') > > Yeah, but as long as the she-bang is (correctly) requiring bash, Yes, that's why I edited my original "please consider using" to "can't help mentioning" :) I recalled that you had mentioned dash in one of your reviews (*), I checked your reply to this v3 03/11 and saw that it wasn't it -- here you'd written "Since you are using bash" so I edited the above paragraph. Clearly insufficiently :) (*) ... Apparently you mentioned dash in a MALLOC_PERTURB_ thread. L.