From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug7vZ-0005lg-As for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 02:26:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug7vU-0000N5-Gu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 02:26:05 -0400 Received: from mail-ee0-f51.google.com ([74.125.83.51]:54641) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ug7vU-0000Mx-8E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 25 May 2013 02:26:00 -0400 Received: by mail-ee0-f51.google.com with SMTP id e51so2999073eek.10 for ; Fri, 24 May 2013 23:25:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <51A0596D.1050300@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 08:25:49 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target-i386: Disable CPUID_EXT_MONITOR when KVM is enabled List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bandan Das Cc: Igor Mammedov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= , Eduardo Habkost Il 25/05/2013 03:21, Bandan Das ha scritto: > There is one user-visible effect: "-cpu ...,enforce" will stop failing > because of missing KVM support for CPUID_EXT_MONITOR. But that's exactly > the point: there's no point in having CPU model definitions that would > never work as-is with neither TCG or KVM. This patch is changing the > meaning of (e.g.) "-machine ...,accel=kvm -cpu Opteron_G3" to match what > was already happening in practice. But then -cpu Opteron_G3 does not match a "real" Opteron G3. Is it worth it? Paolo