qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/15] s390x: reduce TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS to 62
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 21:07:12 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A25D60.9000502@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51A218DF.2070506@suse.de>

Il 26/05/2013 16:14, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> > With the next patch, the memory API will complain if the
> > TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS gets dangerously close to an
> > overflow.  s390x can handle up to 64 bit of physical address
> > space from its page tables, but we never use that much.  Just
> > decrease the value.
> > 
> > Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> 
> Didn't Avi introduce 128-bit arithmetic into QEMU to avoid 64-bit values
> overflowing? Why are you limiting Memory API to 62-bit now?

The next patch makes a difference between artificial memory regions
(containers and aliases) which can have arbitrary placement and width,
and the final view of the address space which cannot have a full 64-bit
size.

63 bits probably would work, but I preferred to be safe since 62 is the
largest used by other targets.

It should be fixable, but if it is not a problem I wouldn't worry much
about it.

Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-26 19:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-24 17:02 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] IOMMU patches for 1.6, part 1 Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/15] exec: remove obsolete comment Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/15] exec: eliminate qemu_put_ram_ptr Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] exec: make qemu_get_ram_ptr private Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/15] exec: eliminate stq_phys_notdirty Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/15] memory: assert that PhysPageEntry's ptr does not overflow Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/15] memory: allow memory_region_find() to run on non-root memory regions Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/15] memory: Replace open-coded memory_region_is_romd Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/15] memory: Rename readable flag to romd_mode Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/15] memory: do not duplicate memory_region_destructor_none Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/15] memory: make memory_global_sync_dirty_bitmap take an AddressSpace Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/15] memory: fix address space initialization/destruction Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 12/15] s390x: reduce TARGET_PHYS_ADDR_SPACE_BITS to 62 Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-26 14:14   ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-26 19:07     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-05-26 21:08       ` Christian Borntraeger
2013-05-27  7:28         ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-27 12:52           ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-27 13:13             ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 13/15] memory: limit sections in the radix tree to the actual address space size Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 14/15] memory: populate FlatView for new address spaces Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-24 17:03 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 15/15] memory: clean up phys_page_find Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-27  8:13 ` [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/15] IOMMU patches for 1.6, part 1 Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-17 21:18 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51A25D60.9000502@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).