qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Lieven <lieven-lists@dlhnet.de>
To: Oliver Francke <oliver.francke@filoo.de>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: flush queued packets when RxBufPtr is written
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 16:24:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A36CBB.7030502@dlhnet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <070AF036-B048-4CBA-ACCB-E419AFE7745C@filoo.de>

On 27.05.2013 16:07, Oliver Francke wrote:
> Well,
>
> Am 27.05.2013 um 08:15 schrieb Peter Lieven <lieven-lists@dlhnet.de>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I ocassionally have seen a probably related problem in the past. It mainly happend with rtl8139 under
>> WinXP where we most likely use rtl8139 due to lack of shipped e1000 drivers.
>>
>> My question is if you see increasing dropped packets on the tap device if this problem occurs?
>>
>> tap36     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr b2:84:23:c0:e2:c0
>>           inet6 addr: fe80::b084:23ff:fec0:e2c0/64 Scope:Link
>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>           RX packets:5816096 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>           TX packets:3878744 errors:0 dropped:13775 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:500
>>           RX bytes:5161769434 (5.1 GB)  TX bytes:380415916 (380.4 MB)
>>
>> In my case as well the only option to recover without shutting down the whole vServer is Live Migration
>> to another Node.
>>
> ACK, tried it and every network-devices might have been re-created into a defined state qemu-wise.
>
>> However, I also see this problem under qemu-kvm-1.2.0 while Oliver reported it does not happen there.
>>
> Neither me nor any  affected customers have ever seen such failures in qemu-1.2.0, so this was my last-known-good ;)
I cherry-picked

net: add receive_disabled logic to iov delivery path

to my qemu-1.2.0 build. I think this might be why I see this.

have to tried to patch qemu-1.2.0 with something like this?

--- a/hw/rtl8139.c
+++ b/hw/rtl8139.c
@@ -2575,6 +2575,9 @@ static void rtl8139_RxBufPtr_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
      /* this value is off by 16 */
      s->RxBufPtr = MOD2(val + 0x10, s->RxBufferSize);

+    /* more buffer space may be available so try to receive */
+    qemu_flush_queued_packets(&s->nic->nc);
+
      DPRINTF(" CAPR write: rx buffer length %d head 0x%04x read 0x%04x\n",
          s->RxBufferSize, s->RxBufAddr, s->RxBufPtr);
  }


Peter

>
> Oliver.
>
>> Thank you,
>> Peter
>>
>> On 22.05.2013 14:50, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> Net queues support efficient "receive disable".  For example, tap's file
>>> descriptor will not be polled while its peer has receive disabled.  This
>>> saves CPU cycles for needlessly copying and then dropping packets which
>>> the peer cannot receive.
>>>
>>> rtl8139 is missing the qemu_flush_queued_packets() call that wakes the
>>> queue up when receive becomes possible again.
>>>
>>> As a result, the Windows 7 guest driver reaches a state where the
>>> rtl8139 cannot receive packets.  The driver has actually refilled the
>>> receive buffer but we never resume reception.
>>>
>>> The bug can be reproduced by running a large FTP 'get' inside a Windows
>>> 7 guest:
>>>
>>>    $ qemu -netdev tap,id=tap0,...
>>>           -device rtl8139,netdev=tap0
>>>
>>> The Linux guest driver does not trigger the bug, probably due to a
>>> different buffer management strategy.
>>>
>>> Reported-by: Oliver Francke <oliver.francke@filoo.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/net/rtl8139.c | 3 +++
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/net/rtl8139.c b/hw/net/rtl8139.c
>>> index 9369507..7993f9f 100644
>>> --- a/hw/net/rtl8139.c
>>> +++ b/hw/net/rtl8139.c
>>> @@ -2575,6 +2575,9 @@ static void rtl8139_RxBufPtr_write(RTL8139State *s, uint32_t val)
>>>       /* this value is off by 16 */
>>>       s->RxBufPtr = MOD2(val + 0x10, s->RxBufferSize);
>>>   +    /* more buffer space may be available so try to receive */
>>> +    qemu_flush_queued_packets(qemu_get_queue(s->nic));
>>> +
>>>       DPRINTF(" CAPR write: rx buffer length %d head 0x%04x read 0x%04x\n",
>>>           s->RxBufferSize, s->RxBufAddr, s->RxBufPtr);
>>>   }

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-27 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-22 12:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] rtl8139: flush queued packets when RxBufPtr is written Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-22 12:53 ` Andreas Färber
2013-05-22 13:33   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-24 14:34 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-27  6:15 ` Peter Lieven
2013-05-27  8:32   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-27 10:19     ` Peter Lieven
2013-05-27 14:07   ` Oliver Francke
2013-05-27 14:24     ` Peter Lieven [this message]
2013-05-27 15:29       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-28  6:27         ` Peter Lieven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51A36CBB.7030502@dlhnet.de \
    --to=lieven-lists@dlhnet.de \
    --cc=oliver.francke@filoo.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).