From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50735) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhKdu-00032e-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:13:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhKdl-0006Iy-UF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:12:50 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:15006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UhKdl-0006Il-Nd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 May 2013 10:12:41 -0400 Message-ID: <51A4BB45.7040708@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 16:12:21 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130527161227.2bd4c3a3@nial.usersys.redhat.com> <51A49BB9.4020302@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Xen-devel] target-i386: Introduce ICC bus/device/bridge List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" , kraxel@redhat.com, Igor Mammedov , =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , jacek burghardt Il 28/05/2013 15:44, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto: > > I actually tested it and seems to work fine but I wouldn't want to paint > me into a corner by setting up a new use case that nobody else is > testing. > On the other hand I dislike having to create a "useless" x86 cpu, that > at the moment doesn't even work because cpu_x86_init seems to be broken > by the lack of the ICC bridge. > > Overall if the QEMU machine model supports it (and it looks like it > does), I would rather choose the "no cpu" option. I also prefer this. I wonder if this change would make xen_machine_pv.c work for any architecture rather than just i386, at least for xen_mode == XEN_ATTACH. Paolo