From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
phrdina@redhat.com, stefanha@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
lcapitulino@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/4] block: drop bs_snapshots global variable
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 17:45:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A5CE42.6000903@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130529090927.GA24346@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
于 2013-5-29 17:09, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:54:46PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>> 于 2013-5-28 15:46, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
>>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 05:25:16PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>>> Am 25.05.2013 um 05:09 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
>>>>> From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> The bs_snapshots global variable points to the BlockDriverState which
>>>>> will be used to save vmstate. This is really a savevm.c concept but was
>>>>> moved into block.c:bdrv_snapshots() when it became clear that hotplug
>>>>> could result in a dangling pointer.
>>>>>
>>>>> While auditing the block layer's global state I came upon bs_snapshots
>>>>> and realized that a variable is not necessary here. Simply find the
>>>>> first BlockDriverState capable of internal snapshots each time this is
>>>>> needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> The behavior of bdrv_snapshots() is preserved across hotplug because new
>>>>> drives are always appended to the bdrv_states list. This means that
>>>>> calling the new find_vmstate_bs() function is idempotent - it returns
>>>>> the same BlockDriverState unless it was hot-unplugged.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> block.c | 28 ----------------------------
>>>>> include/block/block.h | 1 -
>>>>> savevm.c | 19 +++++++++++++++----
>>>>> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
>>>>> index 3f87489..478a3b2 100644
>>>>> --- a/block.c
>>>>> +++ b/block.c
>>>>> @@ -99,9 +99,6 @@ static QTAILQ_HEAD(, BlockDriverState) bdrv_states =
>>>>> static QLIST_HEAD(, BlockDriver) bdrv_drivers =
>>>>> QLIST_HEAD_INITIALIZER(bdrv_drivers);
>>>>>
>>>>> -/* The device to use for VM snapshots */
>>>>> -static BlockDriverState *bs_snapshots;
>>>>> -
>>>>> /* If non-zero, use only whitelisted block drivers */
>>>>> static int use_bdrv_whitelist;
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1357,9 +1354,6 @@ void bdrv_close(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>>>> notifier_list_notify(&bs->close_notifiers, bs);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (bs->drv) {
>>>>> - if (bs == bs_snapshots) {
>>>>> - bs_snapshots = NULL;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> if (bs->backing_hd) {
>>>>> bdrv_delete(bs->backing_hd);
>>>>> bs->backing_hd = NULL;
>>>>> @@ -1591,7 +1585,6 @@ void bdrv_delete(BlockDriverState *bs)
>>>>>
>>>>> bdrv_close(bs);
>>>>>
>>>>> - assert(bs != bs_snapshots);
>>>>> g_free(bs);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -1635,9 +1628,6 @@ void bdrv_set_dev_ops(BlockDriverState *bs, const BlockDevOps *ops,
>>>>> {
>>>>> bs->dev_ops = ops;
>>>>> bs->dev_opaque = opaque;
>>>>> - if (bdrv_dev_has_removable_media(bs) && bs == bs_snapshots) {
>>>>> - bs_snapshots = NULL;
>>>>> - }
>>>>
>>>> This hunk isn't replaced by any other code. If I understand correctly
>>>> what it's doing, it prevented you from saving the VM state to a
>>>> removable device, which would be allowed after this patch.
>>>>
>>>> Is this a change we want to make? Why isn't it described in the commit
>>>> message?
>>>
>>> My understanding of this change is different. Markus is on CC so maybe
>>> he can confirm.
>>>
>>> The point of bs_snapshots = NULL is not to prevent you from saving
>>> snapshots. It's simply to reset the pointer to the next snapshottable
>>> device (used by bdrv_snapshots()).
>>>
>>> See the bdrv_close() hunk above which does the same thing, as well as
>>> bdrv_snapshots() which iterates bdrv_states and updates bs_snapshots.
>>>
>>> So what this hunk does is to reset the bdrv_snapshots() iterator when a
>>> removable device is hooked up to an emulated storage controller. It's
>>> no longer necessary since this patch drops the global state
>>> (bs_snapshots) and users will always iterate from scratch.
>>>
>>> The whole stateful approach was not necessary.
>>>
>>> Stefan
>>>
>> Reading the code, original logic actually forbidded saving vmstate
>> into a removable device, now it is possible since find_vmstate_bs()
>> doesn't check it. How about forbid again in find_vmstate_bs()?
>
> I don't follow.
>
> The hunk that Kevin quoted ensures that we restart bs_snapshots
> iteration - this prevents us from choosing a device that has no medium
> inserted (also see bdrv_can_snapshot() which checks for an inserted
> medium).
>
> This behavior is preserved in this patch because we now always restart
> iteration and it's no longer necessary to reset global iterator state.
>
> But I don't see any code that forbids/skips inserted, read-write
> removable devices in the orginal code. Please point out the specific
> piece of code you think has been dropped.
>
> Stefan
>
OK, original code make sure following code is executed before
savm_vm(), after this patch following code will be always executed
before save_vm(), nothing need to be added.
while ((bs = bdrv_next(bs))) {
if (bdrv_can_snapshot(bs)) {
bs_snapshots = bs;
return bs;
}
}
--
Best Regards
Wenchao Xia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-29 9:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-25 3:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] qapi and snapshot code clean up in block layer Wenchao Xia
2013-05-25 3:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 1/4] block: drop bs_snapshots global variable Wenchao Xia
2013-05-27 15:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-28 2:20 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-27 15:25 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-28 2:24 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-28 7:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-29 7:54 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-29 9:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-05-29 9:45 ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2013-05-25 3:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 2/4] block: move snapshot code in block.c to block/snapshot.c Wenchao Xia
2013-05-25 12:17 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-25 3:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 3/4] block: move qmp and info dump related code to block/qapi.c Wenchao Xia
2013-05-25 3:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 4/4] block: dump snapshot and image info to specified output Wenchao Xia
2013-05-25 12:15 ` Eric Blake
2013-05-27 15:02 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-27 15:40 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-05-27 15:55 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-05-28 2:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-27 15:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V3 0/4] qapi and snapshot code clean up in block layer Kevin Wolf
2013-05-30 2:41 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-31 13:04 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-05-31 13:19 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-06-03 2:22 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-04 12:46 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A5CE42.6000903@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=phrdina@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).