From: Frederic Konrad <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
To: Jesse Larrew <jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
jasowang@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
"Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] virtio: add bus_plugged() callback to VirtioDeviceClass
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 17:18:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF56CB.4030002@greensocs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AE47D3.6080709@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 04/06/2013 22:02, Jesse Larrew wrote:
> On 06/04/2013 12:35 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
> Hi Andreas!
>
> Thanks for the review. :)
>
>> Am 04.06.2013 18:22, schrieb Jesse Larrew:
>>> Virtio devices are initialized prior to plugging them into a bus. However,
>>> other initializations (such as host_features) don't occur until after the
>>> device is plugged into the bus. If a device needs to modify it's
>>> configuration based on host_features, then it needs to be notified when the
>>> bus is attached and host_features is available for use.
>>>
>>> This patch extends struct VirtioDeviceClass to add a bus_plugged() method.
>>> If implemented by a device, it will be called after the device is attached
>>> to a bus.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Larrew <jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> I think this is backwards...
>>
>> First of all, why is host_features not available before?
>>
>> A hook on the bus makes sense because it allows central handling for any
>> devices on that bus.
>> However for a device, first TypeInfo::instance_init is run, then
>> qdev_set_parent_bus() connects the bus and finally DeviceClass::realize
>> is run - and we want to postpone realize further in the future.
>>
> Yes! This would do perfectly.
>
>> So why can't this be in VirtioDevice's or VirtIONet's realize method? At
>> realize time we should definitely be on the bus in this case. I.e.,
>> create vdev->config only after we know how large it needs to be rather
>> than creating and later resizing it, which might fail.
>>
> It appears that virtio hasn't been completely converted to use realize() yet.
> Currently, device_realize() in virtio.c simply calls virtio_device_init(),
> which looks like this:
>
> static int virtio_device_init(DeviceState *qdev)
> {
> VirtIODevice *vdev = VIRTIO_DEVICE(qdev);
> VirtioDeviceClass *k = VIRTIO_DEVICE_GET_CLASS(qdev);
> assert(k->init != NULL);
> if (k->init(vdev) < 0) {
> return -1;
> }
> virtio_bus_plug_device(vdev);
> return 0;
> }
>
> VirtioDeviceClass::init() calls virtio_init(), which allocates the config
> struct. Then virtio_bus_plug_device() is called to attach the bus (and to
> populate host_features). I wonder if it's safe to call
> virtio_bus_plug_device() sooner...
Hi Jesse,
Maybe with little change.
virtio_pci_device_plugged need the virtio-device to be initialized.
Fred
>
>> Regards,
>> Andreas
>>
> Sincerely,
>
> Jesse Larrew
> Software Engineer, KVM Team
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> Phone: (512) 973-2052 (T/L: 363-2052)
> jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-04 16:22 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Notify devices when a bus is attached Jesse Larrew
2013-06-04 16:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] virtio: add bus_plugged() callback to VirtioDeviceClass Jesse Larrew
2013-06-04 17:35 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-04 20:02 ` Jesse Larrew
2013-06-05 15:18 ` Frederic Konrad [this message]
2013-06-05 15:09 ` Frederic Konrad
2013-06-04 16:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] virtio-net: implement bus_plugged() Jesse Larrew
2013-06-04 16:22 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] virtio-net: revert MAC address workaround Jesse Larrew
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AF56CB.4030002@greensocs.com \
--to=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jlarrew@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).