From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59716) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkIHu-00078o-QS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:18:27 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkIHq-0003Wl-9Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:18:22 -0400 Received: from speedy.comstyle.com ([2001:470:1d:8c::2]:2103 helo=mail.comstyle.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UkIHq-0003WM-5J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:18:18 -0400 Message-ID: <51AF8067.3020506@comstyle.com> Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:16:07 -0400 From: Brad Smith MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87vc5s4ptb.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87vc5s4ptb.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Policy for supported hosts/platforms List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 05/06/13 10:04 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > > Hi, > > Below is the coverage we currently have in buildbot. It's not terribly > complete but I suspect it does reflect what people are actually testing > and care about. > > In terms of policy, we should consider buildbot coverage as a > requirement for a platform/architecture to be fully supported. Fully > supported means (1) that code will be rejected/reverted if it breaks one > of these platforms (2) breaking these platforms will be a release > blocker. > > Anything that isn't fully supported is best effort only. Note that are > some things missing from buildbot today (like an ARM host) that there is > strong interest in having as a fully supported platform. > > Host OS > ------- > > Solaris 11 (offline since 2011) IMO having an active Solaris buildslave is fairly important. > OpenBSD 4.9 It is labelled as 4.9 but it was upgraded to 5.2 awhile ago and I had asked Gerd if he could upgrade it to 5.3 when he has the time. In addition to the FreeBSD buildslaves mentioned by Ed it would be nice to have a NetBSD 6.1 buildslave. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.