From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de,
borntraeger@de.ibm.com, jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
imammedo@redhat.com, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Introduce post-cpu-init function
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 11:28:39 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B5F0A7.8090908@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B3ABEA.6000503@suse.de>
On 06/08/2013 06:10 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 07.06.2013 19:28, schrieb Jason J. Herne:
>> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> In preparation for treating cpus as devices
>
> CPUs *are* devices since multiple releases now, so this is badly put.
>
>> we need to separate machine
>> initialization into two stages:
>> 1. Initialization that needs to be done before cpu devices can be created.
>> 2. Initialization that requires cpu devices to already be created.
>>
>> This is accomplished by creating an optional post-cpu initialization function
>> for QEMUMachine.
>
> Whatever you are using it for, this sounds wrong to me.
>
The QEMUMachine->init() function (at least for S390) currently handles
several tasks. One of those tasks is the creation of cpus. If we are
switching to a new paradigm where QOM cpu devices are parsed and created
in main() then QEMUMachine->init() will happen either before or after
cpus are created. This change is meant to split QEMUMachine->init()
into two parts
1. Stuff that does not depend on cpu creation. Specifically, stuff that
might be a dependency of cpu create, like allocating ipi_states.
2. Stuff that does depend on cpu creation. Like
vm_s390_enable_css_support() which requires CPU 0 to exist.
> Machine init is supposed to use less code and more QOM infrastructure,
> with a future goal of replacing most code with a config file
> instantiating and wiring up devices.
>
Duly noted. I can have another look at the code. Perhaps there is an
easy place I can move the ipi_state initialization. Also, perhaps there
is a way to remove the cpu-0 dependency from
vm_s390_enable_css_support(). Both of these changes would remove the
need for the post_cpu_init function.
> And please don't forget to CC me on the next CPU series.
>
Sorry. I had meant to CC you originally.
--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 17:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Define New SCLP Codes Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP CPU Info Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - SCLP Event integration Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - ipi_states enhancements Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Introduce post-cpu-init function Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:10 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 15:28 ` Jason J. Herne [this message]
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Storage key Global Access Jason J. Herne
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 7/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Infrastructure for Cpu Devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-08 22:50 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 16:00 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:59 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-07 17:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 8/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug - Treat S390 cpus as devices Jason J. Herne
2013-06-09 1:11 ` Andreas Färber
2013-06-10 9:02 ` Cornelia Huck
2013-06-10 16:49 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-29 19:41 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 7:24 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:27 ` Jason J. Herne
2013-07-30 14:50 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-07-30 14:58 ` Andreas Färber
2013-07-30 7:42 ` Igor Mammedov
2013-06-13 8:50 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/8] [PATCH RFC v2] s390-qemu: cpu hotplug Christian Borntraeger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B5F0A7.8090908@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).