From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47727) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Un8bF-00088k-3d for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:34:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Un8bE-00044K-0v for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:34:05 -0400 Received: from mail-qc0-x233.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c01::233]:53967) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Un8bD-000440-TC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:34:03 -0400 Received: by mail-qc0-f179.google.com with SMTP id e11so1627477qcx.38 for ; Thu, 13 Jun 2013 07:34:02 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <51B9D856.20901@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 10:33:58 -0400 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1370867173-25755-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <1370867173-25755-2-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> <20130610143842.GB4838@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130610143842.GB4838@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/17] block: stop relying on io_flush() in bdrv_drain_all() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , Ping Fan Liu , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi Il 10/06/2013 10:38, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto: > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:25:57PM +0200, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> @@ -1427,26 +1456,18 @@ void bdrv_close_all(void) >> void bdrv_drain_all(void) >> { >> BlockDriverState *bs; >> - bool busy; >> - >> - do { >> - busy = qemu_aio_wait(); >> >> + while (bdrv_requests_pending_all()) { >> /* FIXME: We do not have timer support here, so this is effectively >> * a busy wait. >> */ >> QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, list) { >> if (!qemu_co_queue_empty(&bs->throttled_reqs)) { >> qemu_co_queue_restart_all(&bs->throttled_reqs); >> - busy = true; >> } >> } >> - } while (busy); >> >> - /* If requests are still pending there is a bug somewhere */ >> - QTAILQ_FOREACH(bs, &bdrv_states, list) { >> - assert(QLIST_EMPTY(&bs->tracked_requests)); >> - assert(qemu_co_queue_empty(&bs->throttled_reqs)); >> + qemu_aio_wait(); >> } >> } > > tests/ide-test found an issue here: block.c invokes callbacks from a BH > so we may not yet have completed the request when this loop terminates. > > Kevin: can you fold in this patch? > > diff --git a/block.c b/block.c > index 31f7231..e176215 100644 > --- a/block.c > +++ b/block.c > @@ -1469,6 +1469,9 @@ void bdrv_drain_all(void) > > qemu_aio_wait(); > } > + > + /* Process pending completion BHs */ > + aio_poll(qemu_get_aio_context(), false); > } aio_poll could require multiple iterations, this is why the old code was starting with "busy = qemu_aio_wait()". You can add a while loop around the new call, or do something more similar to the old code, along the lines of "do { QTAILQ_FOREACH(...) ...; busy = bdrv_request_pending_all(); busy |= aio_poll(qemu_get_aio_context(), busy); } while(busy);".