From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51285)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1UoU16-0004Pc-Ta
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:38:23 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1UoU10-0003X1-HN
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:38:20 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32921)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <lersek@redhat.com>) id 1UoU10-0003Ww-9E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:38:14 -0400
Message-ID: <51BEBD73.4080203@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:40:35 +0200
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <51B979E6.1030504@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<51BA2C56.80106@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<20130613234752.GA14585@morn.localdomain>
	<51BD8E6B.4060802@msgid.tls.msk.ru>
	<20130616153012.GB14318@morn.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20130616153012.GB14318@morn.localdomain>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS]  solaris x86 in qemu? [bisected]
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
Cc: Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, seabios <seabios@seabios.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

On 06/16/13 17:30, Kevin O'Connor wrote:

> Unfortunately not.  There was nothing special about the DSDT changes
> in that commit.  Likely the AML interpretter in Solaris is quirky and
> one of the clauses in that commit (or some arrangement of clauses) is
> confusing Solaris.  This is one of the unfortunate parts of ACPI -
> despite the lengthy specification each implementation of ACPI is
> different and it's painful to come up with AML code that runs on
> multiple platforms.
> 
> You could try disabling acpi entirely.
> 
> You could also try iterating through the parts of that commit and
> commenting out various DSDT entries until you find which one is
> aggravating Solaris.

Also, "Solaris ACPICA" is googleable; two examples:

https://blogs.oracle.com/danasblog/entry/configuring_solaris_acpi_at_boot
https://blogs.oracle.com/danasblog/entry/solaris_acpi_ca_debug_output

Laszlo