From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uog8a-00074c-Fj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:34:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uog8X-0003OE-Vs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:34:52 -0400 Received: from mail-ye0-f172.google.com ([209.85.213.172]:61267) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uog8X-0003OA-Re for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:34:49 -0400 Received: by mail-ye0-f172.google.com with SMTP id l13so1079446yen.31 for ; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:34:49 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Richard Henderson Message-ID: <51BF72E5.5070003@twiddle.net> Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:34:45 -0700 From: Richard Henderson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1371398269-6213-1-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> <1371398269-6213-19-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <1371398269-6213-19-git-send-email-afaerber@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qom-cpu v2 18/29] cpu: Turn cpu_unassigned_access() into a CPUState hook List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 06/16/2013 08:57 AM, Andreas Färber wrote: > + cpu = CPU(alpha_env_get_cpu(cpu_single_env)); > + cs = CPU(alpha_env_get_cpu(cpu_single_env)); > + CPUState *cpu_single_cpu = CPU(alpha_env_get_cpu(cpu_single_env)); > + cs = CPU(alpha_env_get_cpu(cpu_single_env)); ENV_GET_CPU. > + cpu_class_set_do_unassigned_access(cc, alpha_cpu_unassigned_access); Wouldn't it be better to arrange for the function to exist always, with differing implementation for user and system, much like do_interrupt? What you've got is good enough for now, I suppose. r~