From: "Hervé Poussineau" <hpoussin@reactos.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] memory: remove old_portio usage
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:39:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BF73FD.6070103@reactos.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BEBE28.4010004@siemens.com>
Jan Kiszka a écrit :
> On 2013-06-17 09:32, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 16/06/2013 20:20, Hervé Poussineau ha scritto:
>>> Hervé Poussineau a écrit :
>>>> These proposed patches aim at removing the .old_portio member of
>>>> MemoryRegionOps structure, and replacing their usage by .read/.write
>>>> handlers.
>>> Ping.
>> Jan has patches that do something similar, so I was hoping he'd look at it.
>>
>> Jan, are you back from vacation? :)
>
> Yes, and that is the problem. ;)
>
>>From a quick glance, I'm a bit skeptical, Hervé, that your patches are
> addressing all corner cases like mine. Did you see
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/210188?
>
> Jan
>
My patches are less intrusive than yours, because they are probably less
complex. They don't change subpage handling, they don't remove the
register_ioport_*, and they don't move ioport handling to memory core.
However, my patches do not add a new base address field in MemoryRegion,
and also simplify cpu_in/out to be simply a call to
address_space_read/write (like yours).
I don't really care whatever way is chosen. I'm only interested to be
able to put I/O address space into memory space, so I can improve PReP
emulation.
Hervé
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 17:43 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] memory: remove old_portio usage Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:43 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/8] isa: fix documentation of isa_register_portio_list Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/8] memory: handle old_portio accesses in MMIO path Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/8] ioport: register memory regions for I/O port lists Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/8] memory: remove code dealing with old_portio Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/8] ioport: reimplement cpu_in/cpu_out using address_space_rw Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/8] ppc: simplify access to PReP I/O region Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/8] PPC: pseries: Remove hack for PIO window Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-08 17:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] isa_mmio: simplify access to system I/O region Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-16 18:20 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] memory: remove old_portio usage Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-17 7:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-17 7:43 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-06-17 20:39 ` Hervé Poussineau [this message]
2013-06-18 14:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2013-06-18 18:09 ` Hervé Poussineau
2013-06-21 18:11 ` Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BF73FD.6070103@reactos.org \
--to=hpoussin@reactos.org \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).