From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38964) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UorSf-0007A0-MQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:40:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UorSe-0001fj-Iy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:40:21 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21038) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UorSe-0001ff-C7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:40:20 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r5I8eJm1017211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 04:40:19 -0400 Message-ID: <51C01CEF.4070907@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 10:40:15 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1371457366-10993-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <51BED513.3030800@redhat.com> <20130617093241.GA22609@localhost.nay.redhat.com> <51BEDCB9.5090905@redhat.com> <20130617135253.GB3994@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <51BF16B8.6040801@redhat.com> <20130617142605.GD3994@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <51BF213F.60601@redhat.com> <20130617151238.GF3994@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com> <20130618035854.GA17533@localhost.nay.redhat.com> <871u7zx6u3.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <871u7zx6u3.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] block: add 'backing' option to drive_add List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com Il 18/06/2013 08:37, Markus Armbruster ha scritto: > > If not, can we try to detect such case on opening > Gee, what a nice swamp you found there! It is a huge swamp indeed. Since we stop all block jobs on media change already, what about just adding a command "block-job-attach" or something like that which exposes the target of the job as a blockdev (presumably so that you can then add it to the NBD server)? Paolo