From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38641) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uov8Q-0001Dw-2S for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:35:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uov8J-0002Hr-Rk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:35:42 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Uov8J-0002Hm-Kd for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:35:35 -0400 Message-ID: <51C054A6.70308@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 14:37:58 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1371554221-5762-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> In-Reply-To: <1371554221-5762-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Remove hardcoded xen-platform device initialization (v4) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Durrant Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" Hi Paul, (xen-devel snipped) On 06/18/13 13:16, Paul Durrant wrote: > Because of concerns over backwards compatibility and a suggestion that > xenfv should be retired in favour of using the pc machine type I have re- > worked my original patch into 2 patches: > > [PATCH 1/2] Allow use of pc machine type (accel=xen) for Xen HVM > [PATCH 2/2] Move hardcoded initialization of xen-platform device. > > Application of both these patches allows alternative pc machine types to be > used with the accel=xen option, but preserves the hardcoded creation of > the xen-platform device only for machine type xenfv. > > v3: > - Add test for xen_enabled() that went missing in v2 > > v4: > - Remove erroneous whitespace hunk > - Replace hw_error() with fprintf()+exit(1) > - Add braces to single-line if can you please offer an opinion in the [PATCH 1/2] pvpanic: initialization cleanup http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/216940 thread? >>From where I stand (which is "quite afar" :)) this series of yours seems somewhat related to my doubt there. Thanks! Laszlo