From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, phrdina@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com,
lcapitulino@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 09/12] qmp: add interface blockdev-snapshot-delete-internal-sync
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:53:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C17192.6050405@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130619074608.GC23822@stefanha-thinkpad.muc.redhat.com>
于 2013-6-19 15:46, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 02:18:48PM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>> 于 2013-6-18 22:20, Stefan Hajnoczi 写道:
>>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:25:26AM +0800, Wenchao Xia wrote:
>>>> 于 2013-6-15 17:55, Eric Blake 写道:
>>>>> Should this command be made available via 'transaction'? That is, if I
>>>>> have a two-disk VM, and use 'transaction' to take a snapshot of both
>>>>> disks at once, shouldn't I also have a way to delete the snapshots of
>>>>> both at once, or gracefully fail without data loss if the second one has
>>>>> problems?
>>>>
>>>> I think adding it in transaction is not very useful but brings more
>>>> complexity. Transcation is used to guareentee all operations are taken
>>>> in one time point, for example, snapshot creation use it to make sure
>>>> all are consistent to VM. But for deletion, this requirement do not
>>>> exist.
>>>
>>> I guess the problem is: can we make internal snapshot deletion
>>> transactional? It's hard to do rollback for snapshot deletion.
>>>
>> Several deletion in transaction equals to several calls of
>> 'blockdev-snapshot-delete-internal-sync', unlike creation, so I hope
>> not add it which have rollback issue.
>>
>>
>>> But batching is definitely useful for doing 'delvm' in QMP. I just
>>> don't think transactions help. We just need a 'delvm' equivalent in
>>> QMP.
>>>
>> Maybe the caller can encapsulate a batch interface at its level.
>
> 'delvm' is a batch interface - it deletes internal snapshots that have
> the same name across multiple devices.
>
> It's not as flexible as:
> blkdev-internal-snapshot-delete drive0 drive2 drive4
>
> Because that would allow you to specify specific drives.
>
Do you mean this interface should be changed as
blkdev-internal-snapshot-delete devices_array name *id?
It seems not much difference with following methods:
for device in device_list:
blkdev-internal-snapshot-delete device name
> Stefan
>
--
Best Regards
Wenchao Xia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 8:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-14 11:39 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 00/12] add internal snapshot support at block device level Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 01/12] blockdev: drop redundant proto_drv check Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 02/12] blockdev: rename BlkTransactionStates to singular Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 03/12] blockdev: allow BdrvActionOps->commit() to be NULL Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 04/12] snapshot: new function bdrv_snapshot_find_by_id_and_name() Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 05/12] snapshot: add paired functions for internal snapshot id and name Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 06/12] snapshot: distinguish id and name in snapshot delete Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 07/12] qmp: add internal snapshot support in qmp_transaction Wenchao Xia
2013-06-15 9:40 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-17 2:43 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-18 14:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 08/12] qmp: add interface blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync Wenchao Xia
2013-06-15 9:51 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-17 3:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 09/12] qmp: add interface blockdev-snapshot-delete-internal-sync Wenchao Xia
2013-06-15 9:55 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-17 3:25 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-18 14:20 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-19 6:18 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-19 7:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-19 8:53 ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2013-06-19 14:24 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-20 2:37 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 10/12] hmp: add interface hmp_snapshot_blkdev_internal Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 11/12] hmp: add interface hmp_snapshot_delete_blkdev_internal Wenchao Xia
2013-06-14 11:39 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 12/12] qemu-iotests: add 055 internal snapshot for block device test case Wenchao Xia
2013-06-18 14:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-19 6:21 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-19 7:46 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-06-19 9:01 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-06-19 14:26 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C17192.6050405@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=phrdina@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).