From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56968)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UpaZr-0004hV-UL
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:50:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UpaZo-000700-W2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:50:47 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61713)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UpaZo-0006zr-Ax
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:50:44 -0400
Message-ID: <51C2C258.1050003@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:50:32 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1371203313-26490-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<1371203313-26490-7-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<20130620072633.GA24927@localhost.nay.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130620072633.GA24927@localhost.nay.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 06/13] qemu-thread: add TLS wrappers
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Ping Fan Liu <pingfank@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Il 20/06/2013 09:26, Fam Zheng ha scritto:
> On Fri, 06/14 11:48, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>>
>> Fast TLS is not available on some platforms, but it is always nice to
>> use it.  This wrapper implementation falls back to pthread_get/setspecific
>> on POSIX systems that lack __thread, but uses the dynamic linker's TLS
>> support on Linux and Windows.
>>
>> The user shall call alloc_foo() in every thread that needs to access the
>> variable---exactly once and before any access.  foo is the name of the
>> variable as passed to DECLARE_TLS and DEFINE_TLS.  Then, get_foo() will
>> return the address of the variable.  It is guaranteed to remain the same
>> across the lifetime of a thread, so you can cache it.
> 
> Would tls_alloc_foo() and tls_get_foo() be easier to read and less
> possible for name conflict?

Fine by me.

Paolo