qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de,
	rth@twiddle.net
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes & cleanup
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:22:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C85630.9060400@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371714876-2317-1-git-send-email-armbru@redhat.com>

On 06/20/2013 09:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> All I wanted to do is exit(1) instead of abort() on guest memory
> allocation failure [07/08].  But that lead me into a minor #ifdef bog,
> and here's what I brought back.  Enjoy!
> 
> Testing:
> * Christian Borntraeger reports v1 works fine under LPAR (new S390
>   KVM, i.e. generic allocation) and as second guest under z/VM (old
>   S390 KVM, i.e. legacy S390 allocation).  Thanks for testing, and for
>   catching a stupid mistake.  v2 differs from v1 only in code that
>   isn't reachable on S390.
> 
> Changes since v1:
> * 5/8: Fix assertion in qemu_ram_remap() (Paolo)
> * All other patches unchanged except for Acked-by in commit messages
> Changes since RFC:
> * 1-3+8/8 unchanged except for commit message tweaks
> * 4+6/8 rewritten to address Paolo's review
> * 5/8 rewritten: don't fix dead code, just assert it's dead
> * 7/8 fix mistakes caught by Richard Henderson and Peter Maydell
> 
> Markus Armbruster (8):
>   exec: Fix Xen RAM allocation with unusual options
>   exec: Clean up fall back when -mem-path allocation fails
>   exec: Reduce ifdeffery around -mem-path
>   exec: Simplify the guest physical memory allocation hook
>   exec: Drop incorrect & dead S390 code in qemu_ram_remap()
>   exec: Clean up unnecessary S390 ifdeffery
>   exec: Don't abort when we can't allocate guest memory
>   pc_sysfw: Fix ISA BIOS init for ridiculously big flash
> 
>  exec.c                  | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>  hw/block/pc_sysfw.c     |   5 +-
>  include/exec/cpu-all.h  |   2 -
>  include/exec/exec-all.h |   2 +
>  include/sysemu/kvm.h    |   5 --
>  kvm-all.c               |  13 ------
>  target-s390x/kvm.c      |  23 +++------
>  util/oslib-posix.c      |   4 +-
>  util/oslib-win32.c      |   5 +-
>  9 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
> 

I appreciate this.  Works great on x86 and arm architectures.  From
libvirt's POV there's only better error reporting to fix, but that's a
rare race with only a small impact, nothing to do on qemu's side, I guess.

This is what we desired to have, thanks,
Martin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-24 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-20  7:54 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes & cleanup Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/8] exec: Fix Xen RAM allocation with unusual options Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/8] exec: Clean up fall back when -mem-path allocation fails Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/8] exec: Reduce ifdeffery around -mem-path Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/8] exec: Simplify the guest physical memory allocation hook Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 5/8] exec: Drop incorrect & dead S390 code in qemu_ram_remap() Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 6/8] exec: Clean up unnecessary S390 ifdeffery Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 7/8] exec: Don't abort when we can't allocate guest memory Markus Armbruster
2013-06-20  7:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 8/8] pc_sysfw: Fix ISA BIOS init for ridiculously big flash Markus Armbruster
2013-06-24 14:22 ` Martin Kletzander [this message]
2013-07-18 16:31 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/8] Guest memory allocation fixes & cleanup Markus Armbruster
2013-07-31  8:50   ` Markus Armbruster
2013-07-31 12:33     ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-31 14:00       ` Andreas Färber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C85630.9060400@redhat.com \
    --to=mkletzan@redhat.com \
    --cc=afaerber@suse.de \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=rth@twiddle.net \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).