From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32939) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrWfR-0000K9-KO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:04:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrWfO-00088i-U9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:04:33 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:50708) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UrWfO-00088e-O2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 13:04:30 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e32.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:04:29 -0600 Received: from d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.226]) by d03dlp03.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEC219D8036 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:57:27 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay01.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r5PGvYCV124468 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:57:34 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r5PGvXRK021618 for ; Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:57:34 -0600 Message-ID: <51C9CBFC.6040303@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 12:57:32 -0400 From: "Michael R. Hines" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1372125485-11795-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1372125485-11795-15-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <8761x21pvx.fsf@elfo.elfo> <51C96D39.2020603@redhat.com> <51C99EC6.2050008@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51C9A0D8.6050800@redhat.com> <51C9AF15.8000404@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51C9AF56.9030800@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51C9AF56.9030800@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v11 14/15] rdma: introduce MIG_STATE_NONE and change MIG_STATE_SETUP state transition List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com, knoel@redhat.com On 06/25/2013 10:55 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 25/06/2013 16:54, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: >>> Do those few lines of code change the protocol? If yes, I'll go against >>> all my previous recommendations and suggest a #define. If no, it is >>> fine to leave it for later, but I would still suggest posting the patch >>> on the list just for information. >> Ok, you got it - no it does not change the protocol. >> I'll use a #define and send it out with a new version for review. > Make sure you send an additional patch on top of these 15. > > Paolo > Understood. - Michael