Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6][RFC] AArch64 support for Versatile Express using KVM

["Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>]

Am 28.06.2013 14:44, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 28 June 2013 13:20, Mian M. Hamayun <m.hamayun@virtualopensystems.com> wrote:
>> This patch series implements KVM support in QEMU for the ARMv8 Cortex
>> A57 CPU.
>> It depends on the previously submitted AArch64 Preparation Patchset V4,
>> and uses
>> as a base, the existing Versatile Express machine model and the already
>> available KVM in-kernel GIC support.
> 
> This rather overlaps with a bunch of work John Rigby has already done
> (though not yet published to the mailing lists):
> 
> https://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/pmaydell/qemu-aarch64.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/kvm-aarch64-wip
> 
> so now we need to reconcile the two trees. If you'd let us know
> you were doing this a bit earlier we could probably have
> coordinated something...

I had been looking into that tree myself, and apart from John's
Linux'ish "ARM: " prefixes rather than our usual "target-arm: " (part of
which you forgot to fix before sending a PULL), I am really opposed to
copying A15MPCore_priv for A57. I plan to post a cleanup for the A9
version the weekend, now that we have a more elaborate hw/ directory
structure for headers.

Also I would really prefer to have the is_aarch64() helper operate on
ARMCPU rather than CPUARMState. QOM cast removal is underway to make
that more efficient.

Is there a 32-bit aarch64 register in ARMv8 to be accessed by TCG? If
not, the field should be in ARMCPU and a bool rather than uint32_t.

Regards,
Andreas

P.S. This cover letter got submitted separate from the actual patches so
that they are not marked RFC - please use --subject-prefix="RFC" or the
like and suggest to indicate there against which tree it is.

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg