From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsakS-0001Pv-RV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:38:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UsakR-0006LQ-LF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 Jun 2013 11:38:08 -0400 Message-ID: <51CDADD2.2010405@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 17:37:54 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1372101677-46175-1-git-send-email-emaste@freebsd.org> <51CD669A.1010100@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <51CD8985.6020401@redhat.com> <51CDA1E7.9000100@redhat.com> <51CDA797.9000803@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] tls.h: Enable TLS on FreeBSD List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Ed Maste Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell , Michael Tokarev , qemu-devel Il 28/06/2013 17:35, Ed Maste ha scritto: > On 28 June 2013 11:11, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> And of course if bsd-user supported 1:1 mapping between guest and host >> threads on FreeBSD, cpu_single_env would have to be thread-local. > > This is the case for the bsd-user work that Stacey posted at the > beginning of the week and is currently being revised after the initial > round of comments. > > Can you comment on how quickly your tls work is expected to arrive? > We'll have to rebase on top of it, if it's in the next few days or so. Maybe a week or two. To simplify rebase, if you want you can take the conflicting patch from http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/216583/raw. > If it's longer than that we'll need this change as a prerequisite for > the bsd-user work. > > After Peter suggested splitting this change out I sent it to -trivial > because I already had it in a test tree, and it has no effect on > non-FreeBSD hosts. If it's really objectionable right now we can > include it with v2 of the bsd-user series. Yes, that would be preferrable, either with or without the patch above. Paolo