From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com>
Cc: "kwolf@redhat.com" <kwolf@redhat.com>,
"aliguori@us.ibm.com" <aliguori@us.ibm.com>,
"stefanha@gmail.com" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
"mtosatti@redhat.com" <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"armbru@redhat.com" <armbru@redhat.com>,
"dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net>,
Tomoki Sekiyama <tomoki.sekiyama@hds.com>,
"pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"lcapitulino@redhat.com" <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Add timestamp to error message
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:06:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51CDDEC8.1050005@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <A5ED84D3BB3A384992CBB9C77DEDA4D443E103FA@USINDEM103.corp.hds.com>
On 06/28/13 20:54, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
>
>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/time.h b/include/qemu/time.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..f70739b
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/qemu/time.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>> +#ifndef TIME_H
>>> +#define TIME_H
>>
>> I wonder if TIME_H is maybe a bit too nondescript and could conflict
>> with other guards.
>>
>> The guards currently used in "include/qemu/*.h" files are inconsistent
>> -- some use a QEMU_ prefix, some a __QEMU_ one, and others use none.
>>
>> Don't respin just because of this, but maybe it's something to consider.
>
> This should be discussed in other thread...
Ah, right, apologies for the ambiguity. I just meant that either
QEMU_TIME_H or __QEMU_TIME_H would have a lower chance to clash with
another guard than plain TIME_H -- "some" prefix would be nice, but I
couldn't point out a specific one, because the current practice varies.
I didn't mean to suggest that you should unify the prefixes across all
guards!
Anyway, even my QEMU_TIME_H / __QEMU_TIME_H suggestion is tangential;
feel free to ignore it.
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-28 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-27 2:08 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] Add timestamp to error message Seiji Aguchi
2013-06-27 10:21 ` Laszlo Ersek
2013-06-27 19:46 ` Eric Blake
2013-06-28 18:54 ` Seiji Aguchi
2013-06-28 19:06 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-06-28 19:25 ` Seiji Aguchi
2013-07-01 19:00 ` Seiji Aguchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51CDDEC8.1050005@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dle-develop@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=seiji.aguchi@hds.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=tomoki.sekiyama@hds.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).