From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: bobooscar <bobooscar@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Which part of qemu responds to ACPI control method?
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:57:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D2F86D.8080000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ibb9rhw3lt7fpd4j4o0wfkvp.1372770327702@email.android.com>
On 07/02/13 15:05, bobooscar wrote:
>
> Hi,all:
> When a guest domain excutes a control method, such as “_PTS”, which
> part of qemu would respond and handle the request? thank you in advance.
IMHO, like any other method, _PTS (Prepare To Sleep) is executed by the
guest's ACPI interpreter, and qemu responds only to the hardware
accesses that the method makes.
Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 13:05 [Qemu-devel] Which part of qemu responds to ACPI control method? bobooscar
2013-07-02 15:57 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D2F86D.8080000@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=bobooscar@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).