From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34599)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UuG6Y-0002Xp-SE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:59:51 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UuG6X-0003dv-Sh
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:59:50 -0400
Received: from mail-bk0-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::235]:45259)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UuG6X-0003dk-Mq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:59:49 -0400
Received: by mail-bk0-f53.google.com with SMTP id e11so2681200bkh.12
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <51D3BDCD.6020405@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 07:59:41 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1372444009-11544-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<1372444009-11544-5-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<CAJnKYQnMioCa=F_BfnvRdGJmA_3XcFffWW8iYoS-J4Up4es2Ug@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQnMioCa=F_BfnvRdGJmA_3XcFffWW8iYoS-J4Up4es2Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/30] add a header file for atomic
	operations
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 03/07/2013 04:24, liu ping fan ha scritto:
>> > +- atomic operations in Linux are always on a 32-bit int type and
> 32-bit?  int should be the integer type that the target processor is
> most efficient working with.

Has Linux ever been ported to a machine where sizeof(int) != 4?  (Honest
question.  I don't know).

Paolo