From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36299)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1UwDu0-0001y7-1A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:03:04 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1UwDtv-0006pE-J3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:02:59 -0400
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:36927 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1UwDtv-0006p6-BU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:02:55 -0400
Message-ID: <51DAE2A8.20209@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:02:48 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1372930249-22916-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1307041352230.5067@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
	<87bo6ddu6k.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAFEAcA9sQXSEvTSU8JpPQV8kSsVrqg0zv5-P=w8o9Ei8WZTwUA@mail.gmail.com>
	<51DAD155.3010106@suse.de> <8761wl3wp6.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<CAFEAcA8mf6tJ+GTVD2VWSUSjp0hHL3e9D9K6PhWyoQmqK0D1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8mf6tJ+GTVD2VWSUSjp0hHL3e9D9K6PhWyoQmqK0D1Eg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] Xen PV Device
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@citrix.com>, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>

Am 08.07.2013 17:34, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 8 July 2013 16:20, Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:
>> Right, it goes:
>>
>> 1) Acked-by:
>>
>> I haven't reviewed the code in detail but the general idea seems sane.
>>
>> 2) Reviewed-by:
>>
>> The general idea seems sane, and I have done a thorough review of the
>> patch in question.
>>
>> 3) Signed-off-by:
>>
>> All of the above, plus I have ensured that the code is of good quality=
,
>> does not break things, and the other things expected of a maintainer.
>> This is considered to be a legally binding statement too based on the
>> DCO so be aware of that and ensure you have the right approval to make
>> such a statement.
>=20
> I agree with this and it matches my idea of what the semantics are.

Matches my understanding, too.

Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC=
rnberg