From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ux0bS-0002y3-Jv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:03:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ux0bO-0001cn-E0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Jul 2013 16:03:06 -0400 Message-ID: <51DDBDEF.7060209@suse.de> Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:02:55 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20130529203001.20939.83322.stgit@localhost> <1536749.nyBeeYseQi@sifl> In-Reply-To: <1536749.nyBeeYseQi@sifl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] seccomp: add the asynchronous I/O syscalls to the whitelist List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Moore Cc: qemu-stable , coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com Am 10.07.2013 16:31, schrieb Paul Moore: > On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 04:30:01 PM Paul Moore wrote: >> In order to enable the asynchronous I/O functionality when using the >> seccomp sandbox we need to add the associated syscalls to the >> whitelist. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Moore >> --- >> qemu-seccomp.c | 5 ++++- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/qemu-seccomp.c b/qemu-seccomp.c >> index 031da1d..ca123bf 100644 >> --- a/qemu-seccomp.c >> +++ b/qemu-seccomp.c >> @@ -87,6 +87,7 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall seccomp_white= list[] >> =3D { { SCMP_SYS(stat), 245 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(uname), 245 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(eventfd2), 245 }, >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_getevents), 245 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(dup), 245 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(dup2), 245 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(dup3), 245 }, >> @@ -229,7 +230,9 @@ static const struct QemuSeccompSyscall >> seccomp_whitelist[] =3D { { SCMP_SYS(sendmmsg), 241 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(recvmmsg), 241 }, >> { SCMP_SYS(prlimit64), 241 }, >> - { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 } >> + { SCMP_SYS(waitid), 241 }, >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_setup), 241 }, >> + { SCMP_SYS(io_destroy), 241 } >> }; >> >> int seccomp_start(void) >=20 > Any reason this patch wasn't pulled in for 1.5.1? Yes: You forget to put a line Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org into the commit message nor was it ever CC'ed while on the list. ;) Cheers, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg