From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] qapi: Flat unions with arbitrary discriminator
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:16:56 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DEBE58.5000009@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1373363617-4723-7-git-send-email-kwolf@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4085 bytes --]
On 07/09/2013 03:53 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Instead of the rather verbose syntax that distinguishes base and
> subclass fields...
>
> { "type": "file",
> "read-only": true,
> "data": {
> "filename": "test"
> } }
>
> ...we can now have both in the same namespace, allowing a more direct
> mapping of the command line, and moving fields between the common base
> and subclasses without breaking the API:
>
> { "driver": "file",
> "read-only": true,
> "filename": "test" }
[prior to reading the patch body]
I assume that the corresponding qapi-schema.json change that matches the
above wire context is:
{ 'type': 'Base',
'data': { 'read-only': 'bool' } }
{ 'type': 'File',
'data': { 'filename': 'str' } }
{ 'union': 'Example',
'base': 'Base',
'discriminator': 'driver',
'data': { 'file': 'File' } }
with the new 'discriminator' element stating that an alternate name
(rather than the default 'type' name) is in use. Do you allow flattened
unions always, or only when 'discriminator' was present?
Aren't you really flattening TWO structs? That is, extending the above,
we are going from:
{ 'command': 'test', 'data': { 'driver': 'Example' } }
which is previously called as:
{ "execute": "test", "arguments": {
"driver": { "type": "file", "read-only": true,
"data": { "filename": "test" } } } }
to the shorter:
{ "execute": "test", "arguments": {
"driver": "file", "read-only": true, "filename": "test" } }
[...now after reading the patch body]
Oh - you ONLY support a discriminator IF you pass a 'base' class, where
the discriminator has to be one of the fields named in the base class,
necessarily of type 'str'. In other words, the qapi-schema.json needs
to look more like:
{ 'type': 'Base',
'data': { 'read-only': 'bool', 'driver': 'str' } }
{ 'type': 'File',
'data': { 'filename': 'str' } }
{ 'union': 'Example',
'base': 'Base',
'discriminator': 'driver',
'data': { 'file': 'File' } }
If I'm off (or even if I'm right), more details in the commit message
about the qapi description that leads to the final QMP wire contents
would be helpful.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> ---
> scripts/qapi-types.py | 10 +++---
> scripts/qapi-visit.py | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 2 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/qapi-types.py b/scripts/qapi-types.py
> index 960065b..db2f533 100644
> --- a/scripts/qapi-types.py
> +++ b/scripts/qapi-types.py
> @@ -162,10 +162,8 @@ def generate_union(expr):
> name = expr['union']
> typeinfo = expr['data']
>
> - if expr.has_key('base'):
> - base = expr['base']
> - else:
> - base = None
> + base = expr.get('base')
Should this simplification be squashed into patch 2/11? (Patch 4/11 has
a similar construct that might also be simplified.)
> + discriminator = expr.get('discriminator')
>
> ret = mcgen('''
> struct %(name)s
> @@ -189,7 +187,11 @@ struct %(name)s
>
> if base:
> struct = find_struct(base)
> + if discriminator:
> + del struct['data'][discriminator]
Here my lack of python expertise shows, in what may be a dumb question:
Does find_struct(base) return a reference to the original object (oops -
modifying 'struct' here means that the next call to find_struct(base)
sees a smaller object), or a fully-cloned object (phew - our deletion is
to our local copy, but future callers get a fresh clone that still see
the discriminator)?
Meanwhile, should you assert that the discriminator is of type 'str'?
Actually, I suppose it might be nice to support a discriminator of an
enum type (to document the set of valid strings); but the point still
remains that the discriminator field is probably not going to work as a
bool, integer, or struct type.
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 9:53 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] qapi-types.py: Split off generate_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:45 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/11] qapi-types.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:57 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:46 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/11] qapi-visit.py: Split off generate_visit_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:18 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/11] qapi-visit.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:21 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/11] qapi: Add visitor for implicit structs Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:41 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:51 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] qapi: Flat unions with arbitrary discriminator Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 14:16 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/11] qapi: Add consume argument to qmp_input_get_object() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:17 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] qapi: Anonymous unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:47 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 8:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:15 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] Implement qdict_flatten() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 20:25 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-16 8:59 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/11] block: Allow "driver" option on the top level Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:30 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09 9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:45 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 9:40 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:27 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-12 10:53 ` Kevin Wolf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DEBE58.5000009@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).