qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com,
	lcapitulino@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 08:27:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E0123D.2000203@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712094029.GB2533@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1899 bytes --]

On 07/12/2013 03:40 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:

>>> +
>>> +{ 'command': 'blockdev-add', 'data': { 'options': 'BlockOptions' } }
>>
>> Sounds nice - and seems like it should be easy enough to extend BlockRef
>> and/or BlockOptions to have a way to pass an fd even for backing files,
>> getting to (my) end goal of using fd passing to get SELinux labeling for
>> NFS files out of the box from libvirt.
> 
> In fact, I think it might be a schema-only patch at this point. :-)
> 
>> Should this command return anything?  For example, returning a
>> BlockDeviceInfo (with its recursive listing of the entire backing chain)
>> might be useful to check that qemu's view of the world matches what the
>> caller passed in.  Particularly important if we are able to let the user
>> choose whether to pass the full chain or to just pass the top-most image
>> and let qemu chase down the metadata in that image to open additional
>> files for the rest of the chain.
> 
> Does it matter for you to have this immediately as a return value from
> blockdev-add, or wouldn't a following query-block on this device achieve
> the same?

Yeah, that will probably work.  We have a couple *-add that return
useful values, but that was so we didn't have to introduce a separate
query at the time.  But here, we already have the query, and for a
deeply nested struct, that's a lot of information to generate for
callers that don't care, and callers that do care can do a double call.

> 
> I'm not against adding a return value when it's useful, but I don't think
> we should just return arbitrary query-* results if we can't think of
> anything else to return.

It should always be possible to upgrade from {} to actual struct
contents in a later release, should the need arise.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-09  9:53 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 01/11] qapi-types.py: Split off generate_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:45   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 02/11] qapi-types.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 11:57   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:46     ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 03/11] qapi-visit.py: Split off generate_visit_struct_fields() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:18   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 04/11] qapi-visit.py: Implement 'base' for unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:21   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 05/11] qapi: Add visitor for implicit structs Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 12:41   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-11 12:51     ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 06/11] qapi: Flat unions with arbitrary discriminator Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 14:16   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 07/11] qapi: Add consume argument to qmp_input_get_object() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:17   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 08/11] qapi: Anonymous unions Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 19:47   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12  8:55     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:15       ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 09/11] Implement qdict_flatten() Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 20:25   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-16  8:59     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 10/11] block: Allow "driver" option on the top level Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:30   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-09  9:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 11/11] [WIP] block: Implement 'blockdev-add' QMP command Kevin Wolf
2013-07-11 22:45   ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12  9:40     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-07-12 14:27       ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-07-12  9:55 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 00/11] qapi changes in preparation for blockdev-add Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-12 10:53   ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E0123D.2000203@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=armbru@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).