From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com,
gokul@us.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, chegu_vinod@hp.com,
knoel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 1/8] rdma: update documentation to reflect new unpin support
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:39:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E03F4C.9040506@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51E03C2D.9020206@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1793 bytes --]
On 07/12/2013 11:26 AM, Michael R. Hines wrote:
> On 07/12/2013 01:09 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> On 07/12/2013 08:40 AM, mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
>>> From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@us.ibm.com>
>>>
>>> As requested, the protocol now includes memory unpinning support.
>>> This has been implemented in a non-optimized manner, in such a way
>>> that one could devise an LRU or other workload-specific information
>>> on top of the basic mechanism to influence the way unpinning happens
>>> during runtime.
>>>
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>>> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>> I suggest splitting this patch into two; and cc-ing the first of the two
>> patches through qemu-trivial (since formatting cleanups can be applied
>> now, even while still waiting for a comprehensive review of the
>> algorithm in the rest of the series)
>
> My understanding is that the reviews have completed already,
> including a very extensive test series that I performed which
> included both virt-test results and non-virt-test results from both
> myself and Chegu.
>
> Am I mistaken?
It may have been reviewed and tested, but as you just barely posted v3
today and there is not yet a maintainer's queue with a PULL request, it
is still subject to any further review that people want to provide, and
up to the maintainer to state definitively if the further review
comments must be addressed. It's not the end of the world if you don't
split this patch, but at the same time, splitting it makes it easier to
review, and to pick and choose which parts get backported (trivial
formatting vs. new feature).
--
Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-12 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-12 14:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 0/8] rdma: core logic mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 1/8] rdma: update documentation to reflect new unpin support mrhines
2013-07-12 17:09 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 17:26 ` Michael R. Hines
2013-07-12 17:39 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2013-07-12 17:46 ` Michael R. Hines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 2/8] rdma: bugfix: ram_control_save_page() mrhines
2013-07-12 17:09 ` Eric Blake
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 3/8] rdma: introduce ram_handle_compressed() mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 4/8] rdma: core logic mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 5/8] rdma: send pc.ram mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 6/8] rdma: allow state transitions between other states besides ACTIVE mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 7/8] rdma: introduce MIG_STATE_NONE and change MIG_STATE_SETUP state transition mrhines
2013-07-12 14:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 resend/cleanup 8/8] rdma: account for the time spent in MIG_STATE_SETUP through QMP mrhines
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E03F4C.9040506@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=abali@us.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=chegu_vinod@hp.com \
--cc=gokul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=knoel@redhat.com \
--cc=mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mrhines@us.ibm.com \
--cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).