Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 2/2] Add Enhanced Three-Speed Ethernet Controller (eTSEC)

[Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>]

On 07/16/2013 05:37 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 05:28 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>> On 07/16/2013 04:06 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
>>> On 07/10/2013 12:10:02 PM, Fabien Chouteau wrote:
>>>> This implementation doesn't include ring priority, TCP/IP Off-Load, QoS.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Fabien Chouteau<chouteau@adacore.com>
>>>  From the code comments I gather this has been tested on VxWorks.  Has it
>>> been tested on Linux, or anywhere else?
>>>
>> You're right, as I said in the cover letter, this has only been tested on vxWorks.
>
> Could you please give it a try? IIRC eTSEC support should be in upstream Linux.
>

I don't have time for that. As I said in the cover letter, I submit this
patch for those interested in eTSEC, but I won't be able to test/fix it
for Linux.

>
>>>> +    /* ring_base = (etsec->regs[RBASEH].value&  0xF)<<  32; */
>>>> +    ring_base     += etsec->regs[RBASE0 + ring_nbr].value&  ~0x7;
>>>> +    start_bd_addr  = bd_addr = etsec->regs[RBPTR0 + ring_nbr].value&  ~0x7;
>>> What about RBDBPH (upper bits of physical address)?  Likewise for TX.
>>>
>> I'm only interested in 32bits address spaces, so RBASEH, TBASEH, RBDBPH or TBDBPH.
>
> Why? I thought e500mc and above can access more than 32bits of physical address space? 

Yes but this is not emulated by QEMU, right? sizeof (hwaddr) for
qemu-system-ppc is 8...

> Oh, but they're always DPAA?
> 

I don't understand...

Regards,

-- 
Fabien Chouteau