From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39255) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzAP5-0003Ob-LT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:55:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzAP4-0005U8-HL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:55:15 -0400 Received: from e24smtp03.br.ibm.com ([32.104.18.24]:45252) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzAP4-0005Rn-4q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:55:14 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e24smtp03.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:55:10 -0300 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5183A1DC0066 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 14:55:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (d24av02.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.93]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r6GIp6Dq2957360 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:51:07 -0300 Received: from d24av02.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av02.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r6GIt60V025525 for ; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:55:07 -0300 Message-ID: <51E5970A.30306@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 15:55:06 -0300 From: Eduardo Otubo MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373909379-21372-1-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1373909379-21372-3-git-send-email-otubo@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51E46229.1000402@redhat.com> <51E586B4.9000200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51E587C1.1000705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51E587C1.1000705@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] seccomp: removing unused syscalls gtom whitelist List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: pmoore@redhat.com, coreyb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 07/16/2013 02:49 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 16/07/2013 19:45, Eduardo Otubo ha scritto: >>>> >>>> - { SCMP_SYS(ugetrlimit), 241 }, >>> >>> Xen uses getrlimit, not sure what this one is. Perhaps glibc's wrapper >>> calls it? >> >> It seems to be a glibc's wrapper, yes. Removing it anyway. > > Why if Xen uses it? I'm doing virt-test runs since yesterday, it seems it doesn't use it. > > Paolo > -- Eduardo Otubo IBM Linux Technology Center