qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] char: io_channel_send: don't lose written bytes
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:26:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E59E5B.8010301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehaymixh.fsf@codemonkey.ws>

On 07/16/13 20:57, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes:
> 
>> The g_io_channel_write_chars() documentation states,
>>
>>   bytes_written: The number of bytes written. This can be nonzero even if
>>                  the return value is not G_IO_STATUS_NORMAL. [...]
>>
>> io_channel_send() could lose such bytes before.
>>
>> Furthermore, the (status == G_IO_STATUS_EOF) condition used to evaluate to
>> constant false whenever it was reached. When that condition actually held,
>> it always led to -1 / EINVAL. This patch (almost) distinguishes
>> G_IO_STATUS_EOF only when no bytes have been written, and then treats it
>> as an error.
> 
> Just for my own benefit, I always assume G_IO_STATUS_EOF cannot happen
> if bytes_written > 0.  I see what you mean by the comment but do you
> have any reason to believe this happens in practice?

In my opinion, G_IO_STATUS_EOF doesn't make any sense whatsoever for a
write operation (for count>0) if glib kept any resemblance to write(),
and should never happen in practice.

The awkward commit message only captures the fact that I didn't forget
about G_IO_STATUS_EOF, I considered it explicitly.

> Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>

Thanks!

Laszlo

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-16 19:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-16 18:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] changes related to monitor flow control Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] char: io_channel_send: don't lose written bytes Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:57   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-16 19:26     ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-07-16 19:51       ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-16 18:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] monitor: maintain at most one G_IO_OUT watch Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:58   ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-17 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] changes related to monitor flow control Amit Shah
2013-07-18 19:36 ` Anthony Liguori

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E59E5B.8010301@redhat.com \
    --to=lersek@redhat.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).