From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] char: io_channel_send: don't lose written bytes
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:26:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E59E5B.8010301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehaymixh.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
On 07/16/13 20:57, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> The g_io_channel_write_chars() documentation states,
>>
>> bytes_written: The number of bytes written. This can be nonzero even if
>> the return value is not G_IO_STATUS_NORMAL. [...]
>>
>> io_channel_send() could lose such bytes before.
>>
>> Furthermore, the (status == G_IO_STATUS_EOF) condition used to evaluate to
>> constant false whenever it was reached. When that condition actually held,
>> it always led to -1 / EINVAL. This patch (almost) distinguishes
>> G_IO_STATUS_EOF only when no bytes have been written, and then treats it
>> as an error.
>
> Just for my own benefit, I always assume G_IO_STATUS_EOF cannot happen
> if bytes_written > 0. I see what you mean by the comment but do you
> have any reason to believe this happens in practice?
In my opinion, G_IO_STATUS_EOF doesn't make any sense whatsoever for a
write operation (for count>0) if glib kept any resemblance to write(),
and should never happen in practice.
The awkward commit message only captures the fact that I didn't forget
about G_IO_STATUS_EOF, I considered it explicitly.
> Reviewed-by: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 18:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] changes related to monitor flow control Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] char: io_channel_send: don't lose written bytes Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:57 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-16 19:26 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2013-07-16 19:51 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-16 18:19 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] monitor: maintain at most one G_IO_OUT watch Laszlo Ersek
2013-07-16 18:58 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-07-17 10:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] changes related to monitor flow control Amit Shah
2013-07-18 19:36 ` Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E59E5B.8010301@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).