From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzPeX-0007dv-BA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:12:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzPeV-0005c3-5m for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:12:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:21739) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzPeU-0005bm-Sr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:12:11 -0400 Message-ID: <51E67BF6.2090706@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 13:11:50 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1374053373-30499-1-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> <1374053373-30499-2-git-send-email-gaowanlong@cn.fujitsu.com> <51E67368.3000003@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51E67368.3000003@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V5 01/12] NUMA: add NumaOptions, NumaNodeOptions and NumaMemOptions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Laszlo Ersek Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, lcapitulino@redhat.com, bsd@redhat.com, y-goto@jp.fujitsu.com, afaerber@suse.de, Wanlong Gao Il 17/07/2013 12:35, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto: > comments below > > On 07/17/13 11:29, Wanlong Gao wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao >> --- >> qapi-schema.json | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/qapi-schema.json b/qapi-schema.json >> index 7b9fef1..f753a35 100644 >> --- a/qapi-schema.json >> +++ b/qapi-schema.json >> @@ -3679,3 +3679,47 @@ >> '*cpuid-input-ecx': 'int', >> 'cpuid-register': 'X86CPURegister32', >> 'features': 'int' } } >> + >> +## >> +# @NumaOptions >> +# >> +# A discriminated record of NUMA options. >> +# >> +# Since 1.6 >> +## >> +{ 'union': 'NumaOptions', >> + 'data': { >> + 'node': 'NumaNodeOptions', >> + 'mem': 'NumaMemOptions' }} >> + >> +## >> +# @NumaNodeOptions >> +# >> +# Create a guest NUMA node. >> +# >> +# @nodeid: #optional NUMA node ID >> +# >> +# @cpus: #optional VCPUs belong to this node >> +# >> +# Since: 1.6 >> +## >> +{ 'type': 'NumaNodeOptions', >> + 'data': { >> + '*nodeid': 'int', >> + '*cpus': 'str' }} >> + > > Should we document the format for "cpus" here too? I think so---good catch. >> +## >> +# @NumaMemOptions >> +# >> +# Set memory information of guest NUMA node. >> +# >> +# @nodeid: #optional NUMA node ID >> +# >> +# @size: #optional memory size of this node >> +# >> +# Since 1.6 >> +## >> +{ 'type': 'NumaMemOptions', >> + 'data': { >> + '*nodeid': 'int', >> + '*size': 'size' }} >> > > Looks good in general but I'm not sure if hardware tabs are allowed (or > usual) in this file. Definitely not usual---in fact not used at all, so they're probably not allowed too. Paolo