From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52657) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzSh6-0000Im-FJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:27:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzSh5-0002Sw-Aa for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:27:04 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47855) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UzSh5-0002Sn-3t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 10:27:03 -0400 Message-ID: <51E6A9A8.3010209@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:26:48 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1373885375-13601-1-git-send-email-pl@kamp.de> <51E526B3.9070203@redhat.com> <51E52BF8.1000005@kamp.de> <51E52E28.5060701@redhat.com> <51E53137.3020202@kamp.de> <51E534A3.5080907@redhat.com> <51E671C9.6070003@redhat.com> <8733695F-1EA7-4DC7-B697-E54A01205600@kamp.de> <51E676E9.1090406@redhat.com> <27427371-A330-4ECD-A6F4-A295F94C3ECC@kamp.de> In-Reply-To: <27427371-A330-4ECD-A6F4-A295F94C3ECC@kamp.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] qemu-img: conditionally discard target on convert List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Lieven Cc: "kwolf@redhat.com" , "ronniesahlberg@gmail.com" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "stefanha@redhat.com" Il 17/07/2013 16:18, Peter Lieven ha scritto: >>> >> That would be ok if the patches are merged first. Otherwise I could ask Kevin >>> >> to merge my old series (except the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch as there >>> >> obviously is still room for discussion and improvement) and you could tweak >>> >> iscsi_co_is_allocated later? >> > >> > I'll look at your old series, I think the conflicts are relatively >> > trivial. But I think that this series must wait for 1.7. > Would it be an Option to merge it except for the iscsi_co_is_allocated and the iscsi_co_write_zeroes patch. 3 of the Patches fix potential bugs. Yes, of course! And I think I can merge them via scsi/next, too. What patches are you thinking of exactly? Can you write the numbers? Paolo